Skip to content

docs: Solana TX landing active bench V0-Lean (methodology + plan)#79

Merged
Flotapponnier merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/solana-landing-active-methodology
May 21, 2026
Merged

docs: Solana TX landing active bench V0-Lean (methodology + plan)#79
Flotapponnier merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/solana-landing-active-methodology

Conversation

@Flotapponnier

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Résumé

Pré-enregistre la méthodologie de l'extension active de bench #16 (Solana TX Landing) avant tout contact sponsor — Rule #1 du sponsor-proof framework (sponsors ne peuvent influencer ni la méthodologie ni le résultat).

Scope V0-Lean

5 services × 1 région (us-east) × cadence 1 h × ~$159/mo (à SOL=$86) :

  • Jito Block Engine (baseline + control probe)
  • Helius Sender en mode swqos_only=true (isole le path Helius pur du fan-out Jito)
  • Astralane Iris (angle unique : tip refunds)
  • Nozomi (Temporal Labs) — sponsor cible drop journal framing #1
  • 0slot.trade

Documents

Fichier Rôle
docs/methodology/solana-tx-landing-active.md Pré-enregistré v1.1. Probe payload, submission flow, drop reasons (4: timeout/invalid/network_error/rate_limited), 7 règles sponsor-proof, versioning (PR + 14 j window)
docs/solana-landing-tiered-architecture.md Plan de launch V0-Lean + escalation V0.5/V1/V2 avec triggers explicites
docs/solana-landing-cost-model.md Formule cost/probe + analyse tip-floor (avec note corrigeant l'erreur d'arithmétique dans le tableau scenarios)
docs/solana-landing-deployment-checklist.md Runbook 8 étapes pour Florent (keypair, clés API, Railway env, outreach sponsor)
docs/solana-landing-active-bench-plan.md Redirect vers les docs courants

Pourquoi ça doit merger AVANT le code

Rule #1 du sponsor-proof framework : la méthodologie doit être committée publiquement sur GitHub avant tout contrat sponsor. Sinon les sponsors peuvent (de fait ou perçu) influencer ce qui sera mesuré.

PR liée

Code prober associé sur mobula-monorepo : https://github.com/MobulaFi/mobula-monorepo/pull/6396

Test plan

  • Relecture méthodologie §3 (probe payload) et §4 (submission flow)
  • Validation des 7 règles sponsor-proof §6
  • Vérification que les tip floors §3 reflètent les docs des providers (Jito 10k, Helius 10k, Astralane 500k, Nozomi 1M, 0slot 1M)
  • Cross-check métriques Prom §5 avec le code de la PR liée (déjà fait par un agent indépendant — voir conversation)

Pre-registered methodology v1.1 + launch plan (5 services x us-east x 1h cadence, ~$159/mo). Required by Rule #1 to be merged before any sponsor contract.

- methodology/solana-tx-landing-active.md: probe payload, submission flow, drop reasons, sponsor-proof guarantees, versioning
- solana-landing-tiered-architecture.md: V0-Lean spec + escalation tiers (V0.5, V1, V2)
- solana-landing-cost-model.md: probe cost formula + tip-floor analysis (note flagging arithmetic error in scenarios table)
- solana-landing-deployment-checklist.md: 8-step Florent runbook (keypair, API keys, Railway env, sponsor outreach)
- solana-landing-active-bench-plan.md: redirect to current docs
@Flotapponnier
Flotapponnier merged commit 900975a into main May 21, 2026
1 check failed
Flotapponnier added a commit that referenced this pull request May 21, 2026
* bench #27: solana-tx-landing-latency (active probing)

New separate bench page complementing #16 (observational market share). Measures p50/p99 time-to-land in ms and slots, plus landing rate, across 5 services from us-east at 1h cadence.

Querying solana_landing_probe_* metrics emitted by the active prober (mobula-monorepo PR #6396). Methodology pre-registered at docs/methodology/solana-tx-landing-active.md (PR #79, merged).

Cross-linked with #16 via disclaimer + related_benches field.

* benchmarks: add 4 france-cryptos sprint 1 bench pages (018, 022, 025, 026)

- buyback-audit (#18): Hyperliquid AF + Sky SBE on-chain execution ratio
- token-unlocks (#22): conditional impact median bucketed by % supply
- oracle-deviation (#25): 4 oracles × 10 USD pairs deviation bps
- validator-yield (#26): Solana + Hyperliquid net yield comparison

All specs validated against live Prom prod (https://prometheus-production-0859.up.railway.app).
Editorial scope honest: Sky low ratio = batched execution (not failure),
ARB v1 limitation noted, SOL Chainlink lag flagged as real signal,
'Net of MEV' framing rejected in favor of 'Net Yield Comparison'.
@Flotapponnier
Flotapponnier deleted the feat/solana-landing-active-methodology branch May 25, 2026 13:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant