test review summary UI

[ChenHom]

Temporary Draft PR used only to test how a compact Review Reduction summary reads in the real GitHub PR interface. Do not merge.

[ChenHom]

Review Reduction

🔴 Human Review Required · 10 ReviewUnits · Human scope 214 LOC

Critical 2 · High 5 · Medium 3 · Verification gaps 2

ID	Priority	Focus	Open
RU-001	Critical	Multi-file review scope	Diff · Full
RU-002	Critical	Settlement atomicity	Diff · Full
RU-003	High	Withdrawal permission	—
RU-004	High	Refund consistency	—
RU-005	High	Webhook duplication	—
RU-006	High	Wallet credit limit	—
RU-007	High	Migration rollback	—
RU-008	Medium	Cache invalidation	—
RU-009	Medium	API compatibility	—
RU-010	Medium	Queue failure	—

Review decision: PENDING

RU-001 · Multi-file review scope

Question: Can one ReviewUnit stay concise while requiring review across multiple files and code locations?

MUST READ

1. review-summary-ui-test.md · L5-L8 — Diff · Full
2. review-summary-ui-test-a.md · L5-L8 — Diff · Full

RELATED
3. review-summary-ui-test-b.md · L6-L9 — Diff · Full

Evidence: illustrative only for this UI test.

RU-002 · Single-location comparison

Question: Is the changed logic correct with its surrounding context?

MUST READ

• review-summary-ui-test-a.md · L5-L8 — Diff · Full

---

After reviewing the complete ReviewUnit scope, use GitHub Review changes:

• Approve — Human Review complete; no blocking finding remains.
• Request changes — one or more findings require changes.
• Inline comments are reserved for concrete findings, not ReviewUnit guidance.

This is a temporary UI experiment; the ReviewUnits above are illustrative, not findings from this PR.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

[ChenHom]

this test

[ChenHom]

test