Skip to content

Reconcile product trust delivery and work-model direction - #2986

Merged
Chris0Jeky merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
issue-2984/product-trust-reconciliation
Sep 11, 2026
Merged

Reconcile product trust delivery and work-model direction#2986
Chris0Jeky merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
issue-2984/product-trust-reconciliation

Conversation

@Chris0Jeky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Several product and planning pages still described shipped hierarchy as future work, assignments as v0.3, and the estimate unit as undecided. This documentation sweep reconciles them against main 02abedf and live delivery records.

Records the explicit import-mapping and effort-minutes rulings in existing ADRs, corrects capability and routing links, and adds a dated assessment of save/receipt truth, migration data loss, archived dependency projections, attribution and overlapping estimate totals. The proposed next order is assignment repair and existing delivery debt, then estimates and typed links within accepted scope.

STATUS/readiness (#2947), TESTING_GUIDE (#2931) and UPGRADING (#2977) retain their existing leases. Their exact correction packets are posted to those PRs. Assignment PR #2977 remains parked on HIGH #2981; nothing here claims it shipped or authorizes release, hosted registration, stages 4-5 or delegated authority.

Verification: docs governance, relative links (694 Markdown files, zero broken links), golden principles, GitHub operations governance and git diff --check pass. Source and GitHub evidence checked; no application, migration, browser, live-provider or release tests rerun. Historical receipts are labelled. OUTSTANDING_TASKS.md retains 41 open actions.

Closes #2984.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-11T00:44:50.972090Z d31c6fa PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Fresh-context independent review completed at d31c6fa against main02abedfe983b700eb3619ad2d161382820f54918.

Result: SHIP, no confirmed CRITICAL/HIGH findings across all 11 files. Read-only guard fingerprints unchanged. Reviewer independently confirmed merge-history/source support, hierarchy/downgrade statements, decision-versus-implementation boundaries, preserved human gates, docs governance, links694/0broken and diff check. Current GitHub/comment receipts were coordinator-supplied; runtime, migration and hosted checks were not rerun by the reviewer.

Exact shared-doc packets: STATUS/readiness #2947 comment5627603425; TESTING #2931 comment5627603552; UPGRADING #2977 comment5627603651. QA-05 candidate clarification posted on #2903 comment5627608127. All41 human actions remain unchanged.

Review is complete; exact-head Required CI and remaining automatic comments still determine delivery.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: d31c6fa738

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +6 to +8
shipped or that its sessions passed. Baseline: main `02abedfe9`, including the merged overhaul
and reminder recovery, card archive/restore, types and hierarchy. See the
[September 11 reconciliation](../analysis/2026-09-11-product-trust-reconciliation.md) for delivery

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Synchronize the canonical shipped-state document

Until the leased #2947 correction lands, this baseline tells QA that hierarchy is merged while docs/STATUS.md:12-13, the repository's designated shipped-reality source, still says hierarchy is future work under #2087. Agents and QA following the required read order therefore receive contradictory classifications and may omit hierarchy coverage or duplicate delivered work; publish the STATUS correction with this baseline or defer this implemented claim until it lands.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L15-L17

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Declined as non-blocking (documentation-only, law 2a): hierarchy really is merged in main (#2965, 86c6f1b), so this baseline's statement is the accurate one and the skew lives in the unchanged docs/STATUS.md lines this PR does not touch. Deferring the accurate claim would make the newer document less true, not safer. The STATUS correction is already packeted to the leased #2947 (comment 5627603425); no executable instruction here is wrong and no safety property is recorded falsely.

@Chris0Jeky
Chris0Jeky merged commit 22e656e into main Sep 11, 2026
21 checks passed
@Chris0Jeky
Chris0Jeky deleted the issue-2984/product-trust-reconciliation branch September 11, 2026 16:53
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from Review to Done in Taskdeck Execution Sep 11, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reconcile product trust delivery, work-model decisions and next-stage risks

1 participant