Skip to content

Revert "Text index: add internal bloom filter layer"#84977

Merged
rschu1ze merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
revert-84709-ahmadov/text-index-segment-bf
Aug 3, 2025
Merged

Revert "Text index: add internal bloom filter layer"#84977
rschu1ze merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
revert-84709-ahmadov/text-index-segment-bf

Conversation

@rschu1ze
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rschu1ze rschu1ze commented Aug 3, 2025

Reverts #84709

Here we go again. Fixes this new failure in master. It is the same problem that caused the revert of the last attempt to integrate bloom filters into the text index. Interestingly, the problem only occurs in master but not in the parallel replicas CI tests in the PR itself.

@clickhouse-gh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

clickhouse-gh Bot commented Aug 3, 2025

Workflow [PR], commit [6418e8a]

Summary:

job_name test_name status info comment
Stateless tests (amd_binary, ParallelReplicas, s3 storage, parallel) failure
Logical error thrown (see clickhouse-server.log or logical_errors.txt) FAIL
Stateless tests (amd_ubsan, parallel) failure
00984_parser_stack_overflow FAIL

@clickhouse-gh clickhouse-gh Bot added the pr-not-for-changelog This PR should not be mentioned in the changelog label Aug 3, 2025
@rschu1ze rschu1ze enabled auto-merge August 3, 2025 18:42
@rschu1ze rschu1ze added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 3, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 715f101 Aug 3, 2025
49 of 99 checks passed
@rschu1ze rschu1ze deleted the revert-84709-ahmadov/text-index-segment-bf branch August 3, 2025 19:46
@robot-clickhouse robot-clickhouse added the pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo label Aug 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

pr-not-for-changelog This PR should not be mentioned in the changelog pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants