Iceberg writes: data files min-max pruning for simple types

[scanhex12]

Changelog category (leave one):

• New Feature

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes into CHANGELOG.md):

Write more iceberg statistics (column sizes, lower and upper bounds) in metadata (manifest entries) for min-max pruning

Documentation entry for user-facing changes

• Documentation is written (mandatory for new features)

[clickhouse-gh]

Workflow [PR], commit [5adab06]

Summary: ⏳

job_name	test_name	status	info	comment
Stateless tests (amd_binary, old analyzer, s3 storage, DatabaseReplicated, parallel)		failure
	03595_alter_drop_column_comment_if_exists	FAIL
	03573_json_keys_with_dots	FAIL
Integration tests (amd_asan, old analyzer, 4/6)		failure
	test_storage_kafka/test_batch_fast.py::test_kafka_no_holes_when_write_suffix_failed[generate_old_create_table_query]	FAIL
Integration tests (arm_binary, distributed plan, 2/4)		failure
	test_database_delta/test.py::test_complex_table_schema[1]	FAIL
	test_database_delta/test.py::test_embedded_database_and_tables[0]	FAIL
	test_database_delta/test.py::test_timestamp_ntz[1]	FAIL
	test_database_delta/test.py::test_complex_table_schema[0]	FAIL
	test_database_delta/test.py::test_multiple_schemes_tables	FAIL
	test_database_delta/test.py::test_timestamp_ntz[0]	FAIL
	test_database_delta/test.py::test_embedded_database_and_tables[1]	FAIL
	test_storage_rabbitmq/test_failed_connection.py::test_rabbitmq_restore_failed_connection_without_losses_2	FAIL
Integration tests (amd_asan, flaky check)		failure
	test_storage_iceberg/test.py::test_filesystem_cache[s3-1-3]	FAIL
	test_storage_iceberg/test.py::test_metadata_cache[azure-1-3]	FAIL
	test_storage_iceberg/test.py::test_metadata_cache[azure-2-3]	FAIL
	test_storage_iceberg/test.py::test_filesystem_cache[s3-2-3]	FAIL

[divanik]

1. Waiting for the test which show that added functionality is added correctly
2. Waiting for the documentation to be written

[divanik]

Ok, the test seems ok, documentation for Iceberg writes is not even started, so I think it is not sane to block this PR because of unwritten documentation