Skip to content

Improve performance of RemoveRecursive request#86789

Merged
antonio2368 merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
better-removerecursive
Sep 8, 2025
Merged

Improve performance of RemoveRecursive request#86789
antonio2368 merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
better-removerecursive

Conversation

@antonio2368
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Improvement

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes into CHANGELOG.md):

Improve performance of RemoveRecursive request in Keeper.

Documentation entry for user-facing changes

  • Documentation is written (mandatory for new features)

@clickhouse-gh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

clickhouse-gh bot commented Sep 8, 2025

Workflow [PR], commit [f7894f3]

Summary:

@clickhouse-gh clickhouse-gh bot added the pr-improvement Pull request with some product improvements label Sep 8, 2025
@antonio2368 antonio2368 added the pr-must-backport Pull request should be backported intentionally. Use this label with great care! label Sep 8, 2025
@antonio2368 antonio2368 added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 8, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 199d027 Sep 8, 2025
122 checks passed
@antonio2368 antonio2368 deleted the better-removerecursive branch September 8, 2025 12:15
robot-clickhouse-ci-1 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
Cherry pick #86789 to 25.8: Improve performance of RemoveRecursive request
@robot-ch-test-poll robot-ch-test-poll added the pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo label Sep 8, 2025
robot-ch-test-poll3 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
Cherry pick #86789 to 25.3: Improve performance of RemoveRecursive request
robot-ch-test-poll3 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
Cherry pick #86789 to 25.6: Improve performance of RemoveRecursive request
robot-ch-test-poll3 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
Cherry pick #86789 to 25.7: Improve performance of RemoveRecursive request
@robot-clickhouse-ci-2 robot-clickhouse-ci-2 added the pr-backports-created Backport PRs are successfully created, it won't be processed by CI script anymore label Sep 8, 2025
clickhouse-gh bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
Backport #86789 to 25.8: Improve performance of RemoveRecursive request
clickhouse-gh bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
Backport #86789 to 25.7: Improve performance of RemoveRecursive request
clickhouse-gh bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
Backport #86789 to 25.6: Improve performance of RemoveRecursive request
@robot-ch-test-poll3 robot-ch-test-poll3 added pr-backports-created-cloud deprecated label, NOOP pr-must-backport-synced The `*-must-backport` labels are synced into the cloud Sync PR labels Sep 8, 2025
antonio2368 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2025
Backport #86789 to 25.3: Improve performance of RemoveRecursive request
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

pr-backports-created Backport PRs are successfully created, it won't be processed by CI script anymore pr-backports-created-cloud deprecated label, NOOP pr-improvement Pull request with some product improvements pr-must-backport Pull request should be backported intentionally. Use this label with great care! pr-must-backport-synced The `*-must-backport` labels are synced into the cloud Sync PR pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants