Cherry pick #91846 to 25.11: Allow implicit type conversion in Array to QBit cast#92302
Merged
robot-clickhouse merged 10 commits intobackport/25.11/91846from Dec 16, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Remove explicit type casts (toFloat32, toFloat64, toBFloat16) in test queries now that Array to QBit conversion handles implicit element type conversion automatically.
(1) Remove explicit copying of from/to_nested_type before lambda to avoid 'NOLINT' as we copy in lamba capture anyway, (2) move 'prepareUnpackDictionaries(..)' and creation of to_array_type outside lambda (larger capture, but computation)
We no longer need toBFloat16/toFloat32/toFloat64 functions for QBit to operate
Allow implicit type conversion in `Array` to `QBit` cast
eb6fdfd
into
backport/25.11/91846
104 of 112 checks passed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Original pull-request #91846
Do not merge this PR manually
This pull-request is a first step of an automated backporting.
It contains changes similar to calling
git cherry-picklocally.If you intend to continue backporting the changes, then resolve all conflicts if any.
Otherwise, if you do not want to backport them, then just close this pull-request.
The check results does not matter at this step - you can safely ignore them.
Troubleshooting
If the conflicts were resolved in a wrong way
If this cherry-pick PR is completely screwed by a wrong conflicts resolution, and you want to recreate it:
pr-cherrypicklabel from the PRYou also need to check the Original pull-request for
pr-backports-createdlabel, and delete if it's presented thereThe PR source
The PR is created in the CI job