Skip to content

docs: status review of 2026-08-16 - #275

Merged
eaitbrahim merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/status-review-2026-08-16
Aug 15, 2026
Merged

docs: status review of 2026-08-16#275
eaitbrahim merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/status-review-2026-08-16

Conversation

@eaitbrahim

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

A single-page review of where keel stands, for a status meeting on 2026-08-16.

Covers: the live deployment, the one order ever placed and why, rules and strategies, the experiment record, compliance rails, the asset sweep, venue feasibility, engineering and versioning, and the roadmap.

Thesis

The instrument works; the strategies don't. Across the universe, 0 of 20 rules are net-positive at the taker rate actually paid on hourly bars (median n=268), and 0 of 20 reach n>=100 on daily. Daily and hourly rankings correlate at rho = -0.009. Cost, not signal, is the binding constraint — and establishing that rigorously is the project's main result to date.

⚠️ Account figures are withheld deliberately

This repository is public. The version presented from carries the live account's equity high-water mark, the open position's quantity, entry fill, fee, cost basis and mark, the exact order timestamp, and the configured position caps.

None of that is in this file. It is personal account state, it would enter git history permanently, and no claim in the analysis depends on it. Every structural fact, verdict, measurement and roadmap item is intact, and the page says the figures were withheld rather than leaving a silent gap.

Placement

docs/reports/, alongside the existing docs/superpowers/reports/*.html engine-validation reports, which set the precedent for committing a rendered report.

Verified: parses cleanly, no residual account figures (grep for each withheld value returns nothing), and both light and dark themes are defined at token level.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

A single-page review of where keel actually stands: live deployment shape,
the one order it has ever placed and why, the measured state of the strategy
library, the compliance rails, the asset sweep, the venue studies, the
engineering and versioning work, and the roadmap.

Its thesis is the honest one and worth stating in the commit as well as the
page: the instrument works and the strategies do not. Across the universe, 0
of 20 rules are net-positive at the taker rate actually paid on hourly bars
(median n=268), and 0 of 20 reach n>=100 on daily. Daily and hourly rankings
correlate at rho = -0.009, so the flattering daily table carries no
information. Cost, not signal, is the binding constraint.

REDACTED ON PURPOSE. This repository is public. The presented copy carries the
live account's equity high-water mark, the open position's quantity, entry
fill, fee, cost basis and mark, the exact order timestamp, and the configured
position caps. None of that is in this file: it is personal account state, it
would enter git history permanently, and no claim in the analysis depends on
it. Every structural fact, verdict, measurement and roadmap item is intact.
The withholding is stated in the page itself rather than left as a silent gap,
so a reader knows the figures exist and were deliberately omitted.

Placed under docs/reports/ alongside the existing engine-validation reports,
which set the precedent for committing a rendered HTML report to the repo.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@eaitbrahim
eaitbrahim merged commit 67f5fc4 into main Aug 15, 2026
1 check passed
@eaitbrahim
eaitbrahim deleted the docs/status-review-2026-08-16 branch August 15, 2026 20:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant