Skip to content

chore(hygiene): drop org-qualified private repo paths from two docstrings - #767

Closed
mattmillerai wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/scrub-private-repo-refs
Closed

chore(hygiene): drop org-qualified private repo paths from two docstrings#767
mattmillerai wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/scrub-private-repo-refs

Conversation

@mattmillerai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Two docstrings carried a provenance note that named a private repo by its full org/name path. Neither path was doing any work: the unqualified names they describe already appear elsewhere in the same files, and an unqualified name is not what the hygiene check denies. The fact survives, the path does not.

  • comfy_cli/cql/engine.py: the port-provenance line now names the Go package without the repo path.
  • comfy_cli/knowledge.py: the bundle producer is now described by pipeline rather than by repo path.

Comments only, no behaviour change.

Testing

ruff format --check and ruff check clean on both files. tests/comfy_cli/cql/ passes, 337 tests.

Note on the remaining findings

This clears 2 of the repo's 29 hygiene findings. Of the rest, 19 are public model download URLs that the checker was misreading as GitHub references, fixed upstream in Comfy-Org/github-workflows#217, and 8 are a genuine private-repo reference in .github/workflows/refresh-cql-catalogs.yml that needs a design decision rather than a scrub, since the workflow authenticates against that repo and the name is load-bearing. Two markdown link texts in a captured upstream test fixture also remain and are correctly denied.

…ings

Both were prose provenance notes that named a private repo by its full
org/name path. The unqualified names they describe already appear
elsewhere in the same files and are not what the hygiene check denies,
so the fact survives and the path does not.
@dosubot dosubot Bot added size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. documentation Improvements or additions to documentation labels Aug 24, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

Next included review available in 55 minutes.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. Your 116 included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 1 review per hour.

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 6d4848a4-b44a-4e6d-bc39-afb787ade1f4

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e64435a and f17d00f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • comfy_cli/cql/engine.py
  • comfy_cli/knowledge.py

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@mattmillerai mattmillerai added the cursor-review Request Cursor bot review label Aug 24, 2026

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔍 Cursor Review — Consolidated panel

Triggered by @mattmillerai.

✅ No high-signal findings.

Panel: 8/8 reviewers contributed findings.

@mattmillerai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Superseded by #768, which collapses this with the private-source-coordinate move and the gallery-fixture exclusion so a single PR demonstrates a green hygiene check. The docstring commit is carried over unchanged.

@github-actions github-actions Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 24, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

cursor-review Request Cursor bot review documentation Improvements or additions to documentation size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant