Summary
I've used muse spark 1.2 contributor and it it'd been the cheapest model to use at command-code, today was charged my go plan and
started to solve some bugs on a project with 1.3 contributor, only with 54.1m tokens I hit my limits, it means I spent 3 credits on only 54m
tokens. The last month I did 1.2b tokens with 10 credits, doing some numbers it means the performance on my go plan is 666% worst. I hope I
get a reset or part of my credits back.
Expected Behavior
with 300k of cache input I was supposed to get 1 billion tokens on muse spark with 3 credits, I only got 55m.
Actual Behavior
Most of the conversation wasn't cached.
Steps to reproduce the issue
Just coding with muse spark 1.3 contributor
Command Code Version
1.46.0
Operating System
Windows
Terminal/IDE
Unknown
Shell
cmd.exe
Session file (optional)
6a9ce306-af51-4823-b044-d6e85a1eabc7.meta.json
command-code-session-6a9ce306.md
I couldn't upload the session as jsonl.
Fix prompt (optional)
No response
Additional context
No response
Summary
I've used muse spark 1.2 contributor and it it'd been the cheapest model to use at command-code, today was charged my go plan and
started to solve some bugs on a project with 1.3 contributor, only with 54.1m tokens I hit my limits, it means I spent 3 credits on only 54m
tokens. The last month I did 1.2b tokens with 10 credits, doing some numbers it means the performance on my go plan is 666% worst. I hope I
get a reset or part of my credits back.
Expected Behavior
with 300k of cache input I was supposed to get 1 billion tokens on muse spark with 3 credits, I only got 55m.
Actual Behavior
Most of the conversation wasn't cached.
Steps to reproduce the issue
Just coding with muse spark 1.3 contributor
Command Code Version
1.46.0
Operating System
Windows
Terminal/IDE
Unknown
Shell
cmd.exe
Session file (optional)
6a9ce306-af51-4823-b044-d6e85a1eabc7.meta.json
command-code-session-6a9ce306.md
I couldn't upload the session as jsonl.
Fix prompt (optional)
No response
Additional context
No response