Skip to content

docs: add Jarte competitive-analysis notes - #886

Merged
accesswatch merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/jarte-competitive-analysis
Jul 8, 2026
Merged

docs: add Jarte competitive-analysis notes#886
accesswatch merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/jarte-competitive-analysis

Conversation

@accesswatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Adds docs/planning/jarte.md, a research note comparing QUILL's feature set to Jarte (a portable, screen-reader-aware word processor), for future product-planning reference.

Docs-only change, no code touched.

Research comparing QUILL's feature set against Jarte (portable/screen-
reader-aware word processor), identifying print/page-layout polish and a
simpler default profile as the two concrete gaps worth acting on.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 8, 2026 00:48

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a planning/reference document capturing a competitive analysis of Jarte’s feature set and outlining gaps/opportunities for QUILL’s roadmap and product positioning.

Changes:

  • Introduces docs/planning/jarte.md with grouped Jarte capabilities, QUILL comparison notes, and prioritized “ideas to steal”.
  • Adds supporting reference links for traceability to public materials.

Comment thread docs/planning/jarte.md
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
## Executive take
Comment thread docs/planning/jarte.md
Comment on lines +3 to +5
**QUILL is not lacking in ambition or breadth.** Compared with Jarte, QUILL is vastly broader: document rescue, OCR, braille, DAISY, speech, dictation, AI, GLOW, remote files, vaults, Story Studio, formats, extensions, and strong screen-reader-first architecture. QUILL 0.9.0 is described as the final feature beta before 1.0, with the remaining work focused on bug fixes, polish, and reliability. ([quillforall.org][2])

But **Jarte is better at one thing QUILL should take seriously**: it feels like a lightweight, familiar, office-ready word processor first, and a power tool second. QUILL’s biggest risk is not missing “power.” It is missing the calm, obvious, WordPad-like document workflow for someone who wants to write, format, print, send, and move on.
@accesswatch
accesswatch merged commit 72b52ca into main Jul 8, 2026
16 checks passed
@accesswatch
accesswatch deleted the docs/jarte-competitive-analysis branch July 8, 2026 02:48
elettrona pushed a commit to elettrona/quill that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2026
…s, macOS QUILL key

- Redact the crash-report metadata local_crash_file path the same way the
  report body already is; it was previously included verbatim, leaking the
  reporter's OS username in public GitHub issues (Community-Access#886).
- Remove the invalid Expand() call on the hidden root of the shared tree
  navigator dialog, which crashed the Outline Navigator and its siblings
  with a wxAssertionError (Community-Access#885).
- Restore focus to the AI Hub's Provider choice when repopulating the Model
  combo steals it during arrow-key-only provider selection (Community-Access#883).
- Recognize the physical Control key (via RawControlDown) for the QUILL key
  chord on macOS, where ControlDown() reflects Cmd instead.

Updates CHANGELOG, Beta 2 release notes, and the user guide's QUILL key
section to match.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants