🎨 Palette: [a11y] CopyPromptButton의 장식용 아이콘에 aria-hidden 추가

[seonghobae]

CopyPromptButton 내부의 Check 및 Copy 아이콘이 텍스트 라벨과 함께 사용되는 순수 장식용이므로 중복 읽기를 방지하기 위해 aria-hidden='true'를 추가했습니다.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 3810192995050581711 started by @seonghobae

Summary by CodeRabbit

• 접근성 개선

  • 복사 버튼의 장식용 아이콘이 보조 기술에 불필요하게 노출되지 않도록 개선했습니다.
  • 복사 상태와 버튼 라벨 동작은 변경되지 않았습니다.

• 문서

  • 장식용 아이콘의 접근성 처리 지침을 추가했습니다.

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: fcb494c1-bfe4-41f7-a3dd-c4deaa06438f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f8796e and 9998dce.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .jules/palette.md
• packages/web/src/components/copy-prompt-button.tsx

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

CopyPromptButton의 Check 및 Copy 아이콘에 aria-hidden="true"를 추가했습니다. 관련 접근성 지침도 문서에 기록했습니다.

Changes

CopyPromptButton 접근성 개선

Layer / File(s)	Summary
장식용 아이콘 접근성 처리 packages/web/src/components/copy-prompt-button.tsx, .jules/palette.md	두 아이콘을 보조 기술에서 제외하고, 장식용 아이콘에 aria-hidden="true"를 적용하는 지침을 문서화했습니다.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• ContextualWisdomLab/argos#317: 장식용 아이콘에 aria-hidden="true"를 적용하고 관련 접근성 지침을 문서화했습니다.
• ContextualWisdomLab/argos#330: 웹 UI의 장식용 아이콘에 동일한 접근성 패턴을 적용했습니다.
• ContextualWisdomLab/argos#361: 동일한 아이콘과 접근성 지침에 같은 변경을 적용했습니다.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	제목은 CopyPromptButton의 장식용 아이콘에 aria-hidden을 추가하는 주요 변경 사항을 정확하고 구체적으로 설명합니다.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch palette/fix-copy-prompt-button-a11y-3810192995050581711

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

CopyPromptButton 내에서 텍스트 라벨과 함께 표시되는 장식용 아이콘(Check/Copy)이 스크린 리더에 의해 중복으로 읽히는 것을 방지하기 위해 aria-hidden="true"를 추가한 접근성 개선 PR입니다.

Changes:

• CopyPromptButton의 Check / Copy 아이콘에 aria-hidden="true"를 추가
• 관련 학습/액션을 .jules/palette.md에 기록

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
packages/web/src/components/copy-prompt-button.tsx	라벨 텍스트가 있는 버튼의 장식용 아이콘이 중복 낭독되지 않도록 aria-hidden 추가
.jules/palette.md	장식용 아이콘에 aria-hidden를 적용하는 접근성 원칙을 문서화

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 9998dce46873b6ac5c4dad3c3251b3e9acf888a4.

• Head SHA: 9998dce46873b6ac5c4dad3c3251b3e9acf888a4

• Workflow run: 31043932690

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

OpenCode Review Overview

• Head SHA: 9998dce46873b6ac5c4dad3c3251b3e9acf888a4
• Workflow run: 31043932690
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 9998dce46873b6ac5c4dad3c3251b3e9acf888a4.

• Head SHA: 9998dce46873b6ac5c4dad3c3251b3e9acf888a4

• Workflow run: 31043932690

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[seonghobae]

Closing as superseded by #361. #361 contains this exact CopyPromptButton aria-hidden="true" change and extends the same accessibility contract to the labeled previous/next pagination icons. Keeping the narrower duplicate would split review and exact-head validation across branches that modify the same component and guidance.

[google-labs-jules]

Closing as superseded by #361. #361 contains this exact CopyPromptButton aria-hidden="true" change and extends the same accessibility contract to the labeled previous/next pagination icons. Keeping the narrower duplicate would split review and exact-head validation across branches that modify the same component and guidance.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is superseded by #361 and stopping work on this task.