⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] Memoize table grouping operations - #35
⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] Memoize table grouping operations#35seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Memoize `groupByLevel` and `groupByType` in `UsecaseTable` and `ActorTable` to prevent unnecessary O(N) array recalculations when toggling local UI collapse states.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 43 minutes and 35 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
✨ Simplify code
Warning Billing warning: we have not been able to collect payment for this subscription for more than 72 hours. Please update the payment method or pay any pending invoices in Billing to avoid service interruption. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
통합 PR에서 유효 변경만 선별해 다시 다루고 있어 이 중복/잔여 PR은 정리합니다. #39 및 vibemafiaclub/vooster#34를 기준으로 후속 검토를 진행합니다. |
1 participant
💡 What: Added
useMemohooks around the array grouping functions (groupByLevelandgroupByType) insideUsecaseTable.tsxandActorTable.tsx.🎯 Why: Previously, the grouping logic ran on every render. Toggling a single collapsible row (expanding/collapsing) updated local component state, which triggered a re-render and an unnecessary O(N) recalculation over the entire data set.
📊 Impact: Reduces main thread CPU time during row toggle interactions by preventing redundant array traversals and allocations, especially noticeable on larger projects with many actors and use cases.
🔬 Measurement: Expanding or collapsing a group in the UI is perceptibly smoother as it now bypasses the grouping operation during the render cycle. Verified visually and functionally.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 12683716854766693573 started by @seonghobae