What's New
Knowledge Gap Detection
- knowledge_boundary + knowledge_audit prisms detect what analysis can't verify
- Found real errors:
asyncio.RWLockdoesn't exist,O(n)+O(n)mislabeled as quadratic - Two prisms are complementary — neither catches all errors alone
Self-Correcting Analysis
- L12-G: single-pass analyze → audit → self-correct. 90% zero-confabulation rate (N=10)
- Oracle: 5-phase max-trust analysis (depth → typing → correction → reflection → harvest)
- Every claim tagged [STRUCTURAL], [DERIVED], [KNOWLEDGE], or [ASSUMED]
Strategist
- Meta-agent that knows all 48 prisms + 12 modes
- Plans optimal tool sequence for any analytical goal
- 2-call: plan + adversarial critique
New CLI Flags
--trust— Oracle mode (max epistemic trust)--confidence— tag claims HIGH/MED/LOW/UNVERIFIED--provenance— source attribution per finding--depth shallow|standard|deep|exhaustive— aspiration level control--models— show current model routing table
Key Finding
A prompt with scrambled vocabulary (nonsense words, preserved format) scored 10/10. Format carries meaning independently of content.
Stats
- 1000+ experiments across 41 rounds
- 48 prisms, 12 scan modes, 7 CLI flags
- 30 literature reviews (~400 papers surveyed)
- 19 new principles (P206-P224)
- Persistent knowledge base (.deep/knowledge/)