As an alternative way to get metadata of works, Isn't it good to use PII which some publishers use it primarily?
currently, PII can be queried, like http://api.crossref.org/works?query=SOME_PII (however the query result is a list, not the only matched item), but i want to get unixsd response, and something like http://api.crossref.org/works?query=SOME_PII&transform="application/vnd.crossref.unixsd+xml" does not work.
I also can make two requests: one to get PII to DOI converion and another to get unixsd metadata, but this seem's not the best option out there.
As an alternative way to get metadata of works, Isn't it good to use PII which some publishers use it primarily?
currently, PII can be queried, like
http://api.crossref.org/works?query=SOME_PII(however the query result is a list, not the only matched item), but i want to getunixsdresponse, and something likehttp://api.crossref.org/works?query=SOME_PII&transform="application/vnd.crossref.unixsd+xml"does not work.I also can make two requests: one to get PII to DOI converion and another to get
unixsdmetadata, but this seem's not the best option out there.