Skip to content

[AGENTCFG-155] Adding a secrets section to datadog-agent status command output#35311

Merged
dd-mergequeue[bot] merged 3 commits intomainfrom
rahul/secrets-status
Mar 25, 2025
Merged

[AGENTCFG-155] Adding a secrets section to datadog-agent status command output#35311
dd-mergequeue[bot] merged 3 commits intomainfrom
rahul/secrets-status

Conversation

@rahulkaukuntla
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Refer to the description provided here

Motivation

Describe how you validated your changes

The output after enabling secrets, and running the status command (just included the secrets sections):
Screenshot 2025-03-20 at 10 50 19 AM

If secrets are not enabled, this is what the secrets section of the status command looks like:
Screenshot 2025-03-20 at 10 50 35 AM

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@github-actions github-actions bot added team/agent-configuration long review PR is complex, plan time to review it labels Mar 20, 2025
@rahulkaukuntla rahulkaukuntla added changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels Mar 20, 2025
@cit-pr-commenter
Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Mar 20, 2025

Go Package Import Differences

Baseline: 64c2f20
Comparison: 68689ae

binaryosarchchange
trace-agentlinuxamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/core/status
trace-agentlinuxarm64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/core/status
trace-agentwindowsamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/core/status
trace-agentdarwinamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/core/status
trace-agentdarwinarm64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/core/status
heroku-trace-agentlinuxamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/core/status

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Mar 20, 2025

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

dda inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=59798099 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 68689ae

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Mar 20, 2025

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor 64c2f20451b1529f1968779e612f7b40bf7333c0

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.03MB ⚠️ 816.33MB 816.29MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.03MB ⚠️ 816.33MB 816.29MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.03MB ⚠️ 806.52MB 806.48MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.03MB ⚠️ 807.37MB 807.34MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.03MB ⚠️ 797.58MB 797.55MB 0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.02MB ⚠️ 441.95MB 441.93MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.01MB ⚠️ 39.37MB 39.36MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.01MB ⚠️ 39.45MB 39.45MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.01MB ⚠️ 39.45MB 39.45MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.01MB ⚠️ 61.02MB 61.01MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.01MB ⚠️ 61.09MB 61.08MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.01MB ⚠️ 61.09MB 61.08MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.01MB ⚠️ 58.31MB 58.30MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.01MB ⚠️ 58.38MB 58.37MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 37.90MB 37.89MB 0.50MB

Decision

⚠️ Warning

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Mar 20, 2025

Static quality checks ✅

Please find below the results from static quality gates

Successful checks

Info

Result Quality gate On disk size On disk size limit On wire size On wire size limit
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_amd64 780.79 MiB 801.8 MiB 190.55 MiB 202.62 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_arm64 772.22 MiB 793.14 MiB 172.77 MiB 184.51 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_amd64 780.76 MiB 801.79 MiB 193.24 MiB 205.03 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_arm64 772.2 MiB 793.09 MiB 174.16 MiB 186.44 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_amd64 780.78 MiB 801.81 MiB 193.24 MiB 205.03 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_arm64 772.23 MiB 793.14 MiB 174.16 MiB 186.44 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_amd64 37.63 MiB 47.67 MiB 9.75 MiB 19.78 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_arm64 36.22 MiB 46.27 MiB 8.46 MiB 18.49 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 37.63 MiB 47.67 MiB 9.76 MiB 19.79 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_suse_amd64 37.63 MiB 47.67 MiB 9.76 MiB 19.79 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_amd64 58.27 MiB 69.0 MiB 14.72 MiB 24.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_arm64 55.69 MiB 66.4 MiB 12.72 MiB 22.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_amd64 58.27 MiB 69.0 MiB 14.74 MiB 24.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_arm64 55.69 MiB 66.4 MiB 12.74 MiB 22.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_suse_amd64 58.27 MiB 69.0 MiB 14.74 MiB 24.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_amd64 865.32 MiB 886.12 MiB 291.21 MiB 304.21 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_arm64 880.06 MiB 900.79 MiB 277.69 MiB 290.47 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_amd64 1.04 GiB 1.06 GiB 366.3 MiB 379.33 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_arm64 1.04 GiB 1.06 GiB 348.77 MiB 361.55 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_amd64 45.77 MiB 55.78 MiB 17.26 MiB 27.28 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_arm64 44.4 MiB 54.45 MiB 16.13 MiB 26.16 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_amd64 262.64 MiB 274.78 MiB 105.46 MiB 116.28 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_arm64 278.6 MiB 290.82 MiB 100.32 MiB 111.12 MiB

@cit-pr-commenter
Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Mar 20, 2025

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 3670a04f-80cb-4f16-b60c-ce7c9f0dca64

Baseline: 64c2f20
Comparison: 68689ae
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
file_tree memory utilization +2.32 [+2.13, +2.51] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders memory utilization +0.78 [+0.74, +0.83] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.65 [+0.58, +0.73] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.64 [+0.56, +0.72] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.54 [-0.29, +1.38] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.27 [+0.16, +0.38] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.04 [-0.79, +0.87] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.03 [-0.60, +0.66] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.03 [-0.66, +0.71] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.02 [-0.74, +0.78] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.01, +0.02] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput +0.01 [-0.80, +0.81] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.00 [-0.78, +0.78] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.30, +0.30] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.05 [-0.82, +0.73] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.19 [-0.67, +0.28] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -3.40 [-6.15, -0.65] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@rahulkaukuntla rahulkaukuntla marked this pull request as ready for review March 21, 2025 18:28
@rahulkaukuntla rahulkaukuntla requested a review from a team as a code owner March 21, 2025 18:28
@rahulkaukuntla
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Mar 25, 2025

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.
2025-03-25 11:33:20 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2025-03-25 11:33:25 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 2h (p90).


2025-03-25 11:44:44 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: The merge request ahead of this one was cancelled, retrying soon


2025-03-25 12:27:01 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 2f4b9c7 into main Mar 25, 2025
256 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the rahul/secrets-status branch March 25, 2025 12:27
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.66.0 milestone Mar 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed long review PR is complex, plan time to review it qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/agent-configuration

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants