Skip to content

fix(playwright): preserve late failure screenshots - #9896

Merged
juan-fernandez merged 7 commits into
masterfrom
juan-fernandez/scv-288-playwright-screenshot-handoff
Aug 21, 2026
Merged

fix(playwright): preserve late failure screenshots#9896
juan-fernandez merged 7 commits into
masterfrom
juan-fernandez/scv-288-playwright-screenshot-handoff

Conversation

@juan-fernandez

@juan-fernandez juan-fernandez commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

What does this PR do?

Preserves Playwright automatic failure screenshot attachments when the marked attach event reaches the dispatcher after testEnd but before the worker trace is consumed.

The handoff now keeps a stable per-test attachment array and reserves an aligned FIFO slot for every worker-emitted test trace. Expected skips remain excluded because their spans are created in the main process and do not emit worker traces.

Motivation

There is a report of an intermittent failed Playwright tests where Playwright wrote test-failed-1.png, but Test Optimization received neither test.failure_screenshot.uploaded nor test.failure_screenshot.upload_error.

Previously, the dispatcher deleted screenshot state at testEnd and only queued attachments that had already arrived. A marked automatic attachment delivered just after that boundary was silently lost before upload. This is independent of RUM correlation.

This PR hardens that vulnerable boundary. Whether deferred attachment delivery is the customer's exact trigger is still under investigation.

Additional Notes

The regression uses only Playwright test fixtures: a test-scoped fixture defers the automatic screenshot attachment, and a worker-scoped fixture releases it from worker teardown. It does not inspect or reorder Playwright IPC or Datadog's private attachment marker.

Against the pre-fix production path, the focused regression fails with the upload tag absent. After the change:

  • PLAYWRIGHT_VERSION=latest ./node_modules/.bin/mocha --timeout 180000 integration-tests/playwright/playwright-reporting.spec.js --grep 'uploads a failure screenshot deferred by test code' — 1 passing
  • PLAYWRIGHT_VERSION=latest ./node_modules/.bin/mocha --timeout 180000 integration-tests/playwright/playwright-reporting.spec.js --grep "uploads only automatic failure screenshots with screenshot: 'only-on-failure'" — 1 passing
  • ./node_modules/.bin/eslint packages/datadog-instrumentations/src/playwright.js integration-tests/ci-visibility/playwright-tests-screenshot/failure-screenshot-test.js integration-tests/playwright/playwright-reporting.spec.js — passing

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Overall package size

Self size: 8.28 MB
Deduped: 8.94 MB
No deduping: 8.94 MB

Dependency sizes | name | version | self size | total size | |------|---------|-----------|------------| | import-in-the-middle | 3.3.3 | 125.43 kB | 445.14 kB | | opentracing | 0.14.7 | 194.81 kB | 194.81 kB | | dc-polyfill | 0.1.11 | 25.74 kB | 25.74 kB |

🤖 This report was automatically generated by heaviest-objects-in-the-universe

@datadog-prod-us1-4

datadog-prod-us1-4 Bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tests

🎉 All green!

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 100.00%
Overall Coverage: 98.55% (+0.00%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 6d2232a | Docs | View more details | Give us feedback!

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-08-21 10:49:05

Comparing candidate commit 6d2232a in PR branch juan-fernandez/scv-288-playwright-screenshot-handoff with baseline commit e4215d4 in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 2285 metrics, 7 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Unstable benchmarks

These benchmarks have a confidence interval too wide to call a change; treat them as noise rather than signal.

scenario:dogstatsd-with-tags-20

  • unstable cpu_user_time [-350.031ms; +275.750ms] or [-7.566%; +5.960%]
  • unstable execution_time [-352.472ms; +276.119ms] or [-7.504%; +5.879%]
  • unstable throughput [-96129.600op/s; +126273.817op/s] or [-5.387%; +7.076%]

scenario:llmobs-encode-unicode-mixed-20

  • unstable max_rss_usage [-10.966MB; +7.822MB] or [-14.744%; +10.517%]

scenario:plugin-aws-sdk-lambda-inject-with-context-24

  • unstable cpu_user_time [-141.277ms; +248.511ms] or [-3.685%; +6.481%]
  • unstable execution_time [-140.384ms; +248.119ms] or [-3.638%; +6.430%]

scenario:test-optimization-large-suite-20

  • unstable max_rss_usage [-6900.986KB; +5354.986KB] or [-8.263%; +6.412%]

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.55%. Comparing base (e4215d4) to head (6d2232a).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master    #9896    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   98.55%   98.55%            
========================================
  Files         983      983            
  Lines      145311   145551   +240     
  Branches    12565    12864   +299     
========================================
+ Hits       143206   143448   +242     
+ Misses       2105     2103     -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
aiguard 57.13% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
aiguard-integration 55.23% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
apm-bucket-0 57.30% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
apm-bucket-1 62.48% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
apm-bucket-2 61.31% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
apm-bucket-3 58.95% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
apm-capabilities-tracing 62.20% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️
apm-integrations-aerospike 55.03% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
apm-integrations-confluentinc-kafka-javascript 60.30% <ø> (+0.05%) ⬆️
apm-integrations-couchbase 55.90% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
apm-integrations-http 61.09% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
apm-integrations-kafkajs 60.81% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
apm-integrations-next 58.58% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
apm-integrations-prisma 58.03% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
appsec 71.25% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
appsec-express_fastify_graphql 68.60% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
appsec-integration 49.62% <0.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
appsec-kafka_ldapjs_lodash 62.57% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
appsec-mongodb-core_mongoose_mysql 66.07% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
appsec-next 56.02% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
appsec-node-serialize_passport_postgres 65.48% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
appsec-sourcing_stripe_template 63.92% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
debugger 63.44% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
instrumentations-bucket-0 50.99% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
instrumentations-bucket-1 58.80% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
instrumentations-bucket-10 60.10% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
instrumentations-bucket-11 60.75% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
instrumentations-bucket-12 50.91% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
instrumentations-bucket-13 51.76% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
instrumentations-bucket-14 51.01% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
instrumentations-bucket-2 52.24% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
instrumentations-bucket-3 52.87% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
instrumentations-bucket-4 57.90% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
instrumentations-bucket-5 48.63% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
instrumentations-bucket-6 59.41% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
instrumentations-bucket-7 51.20% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
instrumentations-bucket-8 57.62% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
instrumentations-bucket-9 56.47% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
instrumentations-instrumentation-couchbase 49.78% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
instrumentations-integration-esbuild 33.91% <0.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
llmobs-ai_anthropic_bedrock 62.04% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
llmobs-bucket-1 60.57% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
llmobs-openai 61.23% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
llmobs-openai-agents_vertex-ai 59.29% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
llmobs-sdk 67.51% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
master-coverage 98.55% <100.00%> (?)
openfeature 55.24% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
openfeature-unit 53.18% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
platform-core_esbuild_instrumentations-misc 40.80% <0.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
platform-integration 59.64% <ø> (+0.04%) ⬆️
platform-shimmer_unit-guardrails_webpack 38.47% <0.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
plugins-browser-bunyan_bullmq_cassandra 60.69% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
plugins-bucket-0 56.15% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
plugins-bucket-1 53.30% <ø> (+0.04%) ⬆️
plugins-bucket-11 61.08% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
plugins-bucket-18 60.65% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
plugins-bucket-19 58.88% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
plugins-bucket-20 60.77% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
plugins-bucket-4 55.51% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
plugins-cookie_cookie-parser_crypto 50.53% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
plugins-fastify_fetch_fs 59.74% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️
plugins-generic-pool_google-cloud-pubsub_grpc 63.24% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
plugins-handlebars_hapi_hono 57.75% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
plugins-ioredis_knex_langgraph 56.20% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
plugins-ldapjs_light-my-request_limitd-client 57.44% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
plugins-lodash_mariadb_memcached 57.13% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
plugins-moleculer_mongodb_mongodb-core 60.57% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
plugins-mongoose_multer_mysql 58.41% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
plugins-mysql2_nats_node-serialize 60.03% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
plugins-opensearch_passport-http_pino 58.28% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
plugins-postgres_process_pug 57.44% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
plugins-redis_router_sequelize 60.64% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
plugins-test-and-upstream-rhea_undici_url 60.24% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
plugins-valkey_vm_winston 56.83% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
plugins-ws 58.43% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
profiling 60.88% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
serverless-aws-sdk-aws-sdk 54.16% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
serverless-aws-sdk-base-inject-field 50.23% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
serverless-aws-sdk-bedrockruntime 53.93% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
serverless-aws-sdk-client 55.42% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
serverless-aws-sdk-dynamodb 54.74% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
serverless-aws-sdk-eventbridge 56.25% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
serverless-aws-sdk-kinesis 58.27% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
serverless-aws-sdk-lambda 56.46% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
serverless-aws-sdk-s3 54.84% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
serverless-aws-sdk-serverless-peer-service 58.81% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
serverless-aws-sdk-sns 59.05% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
serverless-aws-sdk-sqs 59.46% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
serverless-aws-sdk-stepfunctions 54.67% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
serverless-aws-sdk-util 50.74% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
serverless-bucket-0 52.93% <ø> (+0.06%) ⬆️
serverless-bucket-1 58.07% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️
test-optimization-cucumber 70.33% <ø> (+0.07%) ⬆️
test-optimization-cypress 64.54% <ø> (+0.13%) ⬆️
test-optimization-jest 71.72% <ø> (+0.05%) ⬆️
test-optimization-mocha 71.77% <ø> (+0.06%) ⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-atr 59.47% <59.09%> (+0.18%) ⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-efd 60.13% <95.45%> (+0.69%) ⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-final-status 59.74% <59.09%> (+0.14%) ⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-impacted-tests 59.85% <59.09%> (+0.84%) ⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-reporting 60.86% <100.00%> (+0.12%) ⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-test-management 60.93% <100.00%> (+0.75%) ⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-test-span 59.51% <59.09%> (+0.12%) ⬆️
test-optimization-selenium 58.63% <ø> (-0.07%) ⬇️
test-optimization-testopt 57.36% <50.00%> (+0.19%) ⬆️
test-optimization-vitest 72.45% <ø> (+0.08%) ⬆️
test-optimization-vitest-browser 58.47% <0.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️
test-optimization-webdriverio 64.66% <ø> (+0.09%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@juan-fernandez
juan-fernandez marked this pull request as ready for review August 21, 2026 08:28
@juan-fernandez
juan-fernandez requested review from a team as code owners August 21, 2026 08:28

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2fa88dc6cd

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread packages/datadog-instrumentations/src/playwright.js Outdated

@datadog-prod-us1-4 datadog-prod-us1-4 Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Datadog Autotest: FAIL

The new fixture calls a saved Array.push method without its attachment array receiver. The deferred screenshot case throws before it tests the new handoff.

Open Bits AI session

🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit 2fa88dc · What is Autotest? · @DataDog review to ask questions · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest

@juan-fernandez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@juan-fernandez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/datadog autotest review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f9f0b8d440

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread packages/datadog-instrumentations/src/playwright.js Outdated

@datadog-ddstaging datadog-ddstaging Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Datadog Autotest: FAIL

A restored disabled test reserves a screenshot FIFO slot but sends no worker trace. This shifts later screenshot data and can remove or misassign a failure screenshot.

Open Bits AI session

🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit f9f0b8d · What is Autotest? · @DataDog review to ask questions · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest

Comment thread packages/datadog-instrumentations/src/playwright.js Outdated

@datadog-prod-us1-4 datadog-prod-us1-4 Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Datadog Autotest: PASS

More details

The PR keeps stable per-test screenshot arrays,
aligns them with worker traces,
and excludes expected skips and skipped EFD retries.
The new commit fixes the detached Array.push call,
so no open finding remains.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

Open Bits AI session

🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit f9f0b8d · What is Autotest? · @DataDog review to ask questions · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest

@juan-fernandez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@juan-fernandez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/datadog autotest review

@datadog-ddstaging datadog-ddstaging Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Datadog Autotest: PASS

More details

This PR keeps late Playwright failure screenshots until the worker trace uses them.
The new commit excludes restored disabled tests from the screenshot queue.
This change fixes the earlier queue shift that could lose or misassign a later screenshot.
It also adds direct coverage for a failure after a disabled serial-retry sibling.
No open finding remains in the current PR diff.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

Open Bits AI session

🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit 69d8d55 · What is Autotest? · @DataDog review to ask questions · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Breezy!

Reviewed commit: 69d8d55c40

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@datadog-prod-us1-4 datadog-prod-us1-4 Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Datadog Autotest: PASS

More details

The PR preserves late Playwright failure screenshots.
It aligns screenshot arrays with worker traces.
It excludes expected skips, skipped EFD retries, and disabled serial retries.
The earlier detached push defect is fixed.
No open finding remains.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

Open Bits AI session

🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit 69d8d55 · What is Autotest? · @DataDog review to ask questions · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest

@juan-fernandez
juan-fernandez enabled auto-merge (squash) August 21, 2026 10:01

@BridgeAR BridgeAR left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While I do not know the domain parts, the code is LGTM

Just the skip part would be nice to land

Comment thread integration-tests/playwright/playwright-efd.spec.js Outdated
Comment thread integration-tests/playwright/playwright-reporting.spec.js Outdated
@juan-fernandez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@juan-fernandez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/datadog autotest review

@datadog-ddstaging datadog-ddstaging Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Datadog Autotest: PASS

More details

The PR keeps late Playwright failure screenshots until the worker trace consumes them.
It keeps the screenshot queue aligned when EFD or restored disabled tests do not emit worker traces.
The prior disabled-test queue issue remains fixed and has direct serial-retry coverage.
The latest commit registers two Playwright 1.60 tests as explicit skips on unsupported versions.
No open finding remains.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

Open Bits AI session

🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit 6d2232a · What is Autotest? · @DataDog review to ask questions · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one!

Reviewed commit: 6d2232aac3

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@datadog-prod-us1-4 datadog-prod-us1-4 Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Datadog Autotest: PASS

More details

The PR preserves late Playwright failure screenshots.
It aligns screenshot arrays with worker traces.
It excludes expected skips, skipped EFD retries, and disabled serial retries.
The earlier detached push defect remains fixed.
The latest test registration change adds no new issue, and no open finding remains.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

Open Bits AI session

🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit 6d2232a · What is Autotest? · @DataDog review to ask questions · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest

@juan-fernandez
juan-fernandez merged commit 1baa5bc into master Aug 21, 2026
681 checks passed
@juan-fernandez
juan-fernandez deleted the juan-fernandez/scv-288-playwright-screenshot-handoff branch August 21, 2026 11:07
This was referenced Aug 24, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants