[Dispatcher] Task Test Runner

[HadhemiDD]

What does this PR do?

Create the processor as described here

Motivation

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

• Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
• Add the qa/skip-qa label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.
• If you need to backport this PR to another branch, you can add the backport/<branch-name> label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged

[dd-octo-sts]

⚠️ Recommendation: Add qa/skip-qa label

This PR does not modify any files shipped with the agent.

To help streamline the release process, please consider adding the qa/skip-qa label if these changes do not require QA testing.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 5e920df3a4

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Request run details before parsing dispatch response

create_workflow_dispatch now unconditionally parses the response body as WorkflowDispatchResult, but GitHub’s workflow dispatch endpoint only returns JSON when return_run_details=true; otherwise it still returns 204 No Content. In that default/legacy path (including older API versions and GHES), response.json() raises and the dispatcher fails before any polling starts, so TaskTestRunner.process_message cannot run. Please either send return_run_details: true in the request body or keep backward-compatible handling for 204 responses.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

[datadog-datadog-prod-us1]

🎉 All green!

❄️ No new flaky tests detected
🧪 All tests passed

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 96.00%
• Overall Coverage: 87.31% (+0.18%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 02e13e0 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 96.00000% with 21 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.81%. Comparing base (df5b219) to head (02e13e0).
⚠️ Report is 16 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[dd-octo-sts]

Validation Report

All 20 validations passed.

Show details

Validation	Description	Status
agent-reqs	Verify check versions match the Agent requirements file	✅
ci	Validate CI configuration and Codecov settings	✅
codeowners	Validate every integration has a CODEOWNERS entry	✅
config	Validate default configuration files against spec.yaml	✅
dep	Verify dependency pins are consistent and Agent-compatible	✅
http	Validate integrations use the HTTP wrapper correctly	✅
imports	Validate check imports do not use deprecated modules	✅
integration-style	Validate check code style conventions	✅
jmx-metrics	Validate JMX metrics definition files and config	✅
labeler	Validate PR labeler config matches integration directories	✅
legacy-signature	Validate no integration uses the legacy Agent check signature	✅
license-headers	Validate Python files have proper license headers	✅
licenses	Validate third-party license attribution list	✅
metadata	Validate metadata.csv metric definitions	✅
models	Validate configuration data models match spec.yaml	✅
openmetrics	Validate OpenMetrics integrations disable the metric limit	✅
package	Validate Python package metadata and naming	✅
readmes	Validate README files have required sections	✅
saved-views	Validate saved view JSON file structure and fields	✅
version	Validate version consistency between package and changelog	✅

View full run