Skip to content

feat(data-pipeline-ffi): add OTLP trace headers - #2317

Draft
bm1549 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
brian.marks/otlp-headers-ffi
Draft

feat(data-pipeline-ffi): add OTLP trace headers#2317
bm1549 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
brian.marks/otlp-headers-ffi

Conversation

@bm1549

@bm1549 bm1549 commented Aug 5, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Concise implementation report

AI was used to help implement and review this change. I read and verified the resulting code.

Adds ddog_trace_exporter_config_add_otlp_header to the trace exporter C API. The setter:

  • passes OTLP request headers into the existing data-pipeline exporter
  • rejects malformed HTTP names and values before changing the configuration
  • keeps header contents out of warnings

Repeated names use the last configured value. The FFI example now shows endpoint, header, timeout, protocol, and instrumentation-scope configuration.

Motivation

Language tracers need to pass standard OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP*_HEADERS settings into libdatadog when they use its OTLP trace exporter. dd-trace-rb is the first consumer in this change set.

Additional Notes

This is an additive C API. The protocol setter still accepts only http/json and http/protobuf; the existing protocol enum leaves room for gRPC support later.

Companion changes: dd-trace-rb #6152 and system-tests #7458.

How to test the change?

  • cargo check -p libdd-data-pipeline-ffi
  • cargo +stable clippy -p libdd-data-pipeline-ffi --all-targets --no-deps -- -D warnings
  • cargo nextest run -p libdd-data-pipeline-ffi — 67 passed
  • cargo ffi-test — the trace exporter example passed; the full macOS run also reported pre-existing crashtracking signal and missing FFE fixture failures
  • cargo deny --manifest-path libdd-data-pipeline-ffi/Cargo.toml --color never --log-level error check advisories bans sources — reports existing crossbeam, rand, and time advisories

@bm1549 bm1549 added the AI Generated PR largely written by AI tools label Aug 5, 2026
This was referenced Aug 5, 2026
Draft
Draft
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 5, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📚 Documentation Check Results

⚠️ 2581 documentation warning(s) found

📦 libdd-data-pipeline-ffi - 1346 warning(s)

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 1235 warning(s)

Updated: 2026-08-05 02:40:58 UTC | Commit: e03404b | missing-docs job results

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 5, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔒 Cargo Deny Results

⚠️ 6 issue(s) found, showing only errors (advisories, bans, sources)

📦 libdd-data-pipeline-ffi - 3 error(s)

Show output 
error[vulnerability]: Invalid pointer dereference in `fmt::Pointer` impl for `Atomic` and `Shared` when the underlying pointer is invalid
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:78:1
   │
78 │ crossbeam-epoch 0.9.18 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0204
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0204
   ├ Affected versions of `fmt::Display` dereference the underlying pointer. This causes a invalid pointer dereference e.g., when a pointer created with `Atomic::null` or `Shared::null`. `fmt::Debug` impls and pre-0.9 `fmt::Display` impls, which do not dereference pointers, are not affected by this issue.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/pull/1276
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.9.20 (try `cargo update -p crossbeam-epoch`)
   ├ crossbeam-epoch v0.9.18
     └── crossbeam-deque v0.8.5
         └── rayon-core v1.12.1
             └── rayon v1.10.0
                 └── criterion v0.5.1
                     ├── libdd-common v5.1.0
                     │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v3.0.0
                     │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0
                     │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v38.0.0
                     │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v38.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v2.0.0
                     │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v38.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v4.0.0
                     │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0
                     │   │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0
                     │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   ├── (dev) libdd-telemetry v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0
                     │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   │       ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v38.0.0 (*)
                     │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v5.0.0
                     │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-common-ffi v38.0.0
                     │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v38.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v4.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v2.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v5.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.1.0
                     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v3.0.0
                     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-trace-obfuscation v5.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:228:1
    │
228 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by [@lopopolo](https://github.com/lopopolo)) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── libdd-common v5.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v3.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0
      │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v38.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v38.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v2.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v38.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v4.0.0
      │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0
      │   │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0
      │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── (dev) libdd-telemetry v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v38.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v5.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common-ffi v38.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v38.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v2.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v3.0.0
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v38.0.0 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:298:1
    │
298 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0
                  └── libdd-data-pipeline-ffi v38.0.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 3 error(s)

Show output 
error[vulnerability]: Invalid pointer dereference in `fmt::Pointer` impl for `Atomic` and `Shared` when the underlying pointer is invalid
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:75:1
   │
75 │ crossbeam-epoch 0.9.18 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0204
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0204
   ├ Affected versions of `fmt::Display` dereference the underlying pointer. This causes a invalid pointer dereference e.g., when a pointer created with `Atomic::null` or `Shared::null`. `fmt::Debug` impls and pre-0.9 `fmt::Display` impls, which do not dereference pointers, are not affected by this issue.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/pull/1276
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.9.20 (try `cargo update -p crossbeam-epoch`)
   ├ crossbeam-epoch v0.9.18
     └── crossbeam-deque v0.8.5
         └── rayon-core v1.12.1
             └── rayon v1.10.0
                 └── criterion v0.5.1
                     ├── libdd-common v5.1.0
                     │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v3.0.0
                     │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0
                     │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v2.0.0
                     │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v4.0.0
                     │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0
                     │   │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0
                     │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   ├── (dev) libdd-telemetry v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0
                     │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v5.0.0
                     │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v4.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v2.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v5.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.1.0
                     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v3.0.0
                     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-trace-obfuscation v5.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:220:1
    │
220 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by [@lopopolo](https://github.com/lopopolo)) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── libdd-common v5.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v3.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v2.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v4.0.0
      │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0
      │   │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0
      │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── (dev) libdd-telemetry v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v5.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v2.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v3.0.0
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:289:1
    │
289 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

Updated: 2026-08-05 02:42:17 UTC | Commit: e03404b | dependency-check job results

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented Aug 5, 2026 •
edited by datadog-datadog-prod-us1 Bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tests

🎉 All green!

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 98.55%
• Overall Coverage: 75.11% (+0.08%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: aedeed3 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Aug 5, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Comparison

Benchmark execution time: 2026-08-05 03:13:09

Comparing candidate commit aedeed3 in PR branch brian.marks/otlp-headers-ffi with baseline commit 94f123f in branch main.

Found 2 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 137 metrics, 0 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:msgpack_decoder::v05/high_sharing/2000

  • 🟩 execution_time [-99.271µs; -97.477µs] or [-5.936%; -5.828%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+74053.018op/s; +75426.244op/s] or [+6.193%; +6.307%]

scenario:vec_map/get_miss/64

  • 🟥 execution_time [+28.068ns; +28.237ns] or [+98.851%; +99.447%]

Benchmark execution time: 2026-08-05 03:22:53

Comparing candidate commit aedeed3 in PR branch brian.marks/otlp-headers-ffi with baseline commit 94f123f in branch main.

Found 4 performance improvements and 4 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 160 metrics, 10 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:alloc_free/system/4096

  • 🟥 execution_time [+13.394ns; +13.570ns] or [+16.767%; +16.987%]

scenario:datadog_sample_span/multiple_rules_first_match/wall_time

  • 🟥 execution_time [+7.649ns; +7.721ns] or [+4.751%; +4.795%]

scenario:datadog_sample_span/name_pattern_rule_matching/wall_time

  • 🟥 execution_time [+10.282ns; +10.458ns] or [+4.008%; +4.077%]

scenario:ddsketch_encode/into_pb/clustered_near_zero

  • 🟩 execution_time [-6.161ns; -5.523ns] or [-15.110%; -13.544%]

scenario:ddsketch_encode/into_pb/collapsing

  • 🟩 execution_time [-6.795ns; -5.737ns] or [-15.218%; -12.849%]

scenario:ddsketch_encode/into_pb/large_values

  • 🟩 execution_time [-6.611ns; -6.039ns] or [-16.044%; -14.656%]

scenario:ddsketch_encode/into_pb/mixed

  • 🟩 execution_time [-6.592ns; -5.768ns] or [-15.598%; -13.648%]

scenario:no_profiler/short_circuit/4096

  • 🟥 execution_time [+7.359ns; +7.508ns] or [+7.662%; +7.818%]

Candidate

Omitted due to size.

Baseline

Omitted due to size.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

AI Generated PR largely written by AI tools data-pipeline

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@bm1549