Note (verbatim, from paper/manuscript_marine.qmd around line 487, in # The multiverse of processing choices {#sec:multiverse}, right before Fig. demo_10_deviations.png):
this text should present the tectonic and environmental context tested here, the
expected sensor network that it would correspond too, the typical environmental noise.
Context: the preceding paragraph (lines 472-485) describes the one-at-a-time deviation-from-best-practice test and its ranked results (estimator/reference dominate, band/gating are second-order) but never states what physical scenario (tectonic setting, sensor deployment, ambient noise level) the underlying synthetic dataset represents.
Acceptance criterion: a paragraph, placed before or alongside Fig. fig:deviations, stating the tectonic/environmental setting represented by the synthetic scenario, the sensor network geometry it corresponds to, and the typical environmental noise level assumed — verified against what src/codameter/synthetic_demo.py (or whichever script generates demo_10_deviations.png) actually simulates, not invented after the fact.
Note (verbatim, from
paper/manuscript_marine.qmdaround line 487, in# The multiverse of processing choices {#sec:multiverse}, right before Fig.demo_10_deviations.png):Context: the preceding paragraph (lines 472-485) describes the one-at-a-time deviation-from-best-practice test and its ranked results (estimator/reference dominate, band/gating are second-order) but never states what physical scenario (tectonic setting, sensor deployment, ambient noise level) the underlying synthetic dataset represents.
Acceptance criterion: a paragraph, placed before or alongside Fig.
fig:deviations, stating the tectonic/environmental setting represented by the synthetic scenario, the sensor network geometry it corresponds to, and the typical environmental noise level assumed — verified against whatsrc/codameter/synthetic_demo.py(or whichever script generatesdemo_10_deviations.png) actually simulates, not invented after the fact.