Plug-and-play startup repair / 即開即用啟動修復 #7
Replies: 14 comments
🧭 Coordination checkpoint
Note Discussion #7 remains the rolling evidence record. No source change has been claimed yet. 🇭🇰 廣東話三路調查已經開工:runtime、desktop/GUI onboarding、同 setup/docs 歷史各自獨立驗證。指令 repository 而家冇 open issue。GitHub Projects 因 active account 冇 |
🔎 Root cause verified / 已確認根因Important This was two independent failures, not a missing upstream API key. 呢次係 兩個獨立故障,唔係少咗上游 API key;個畫面見到 key 就即刻捉錯賊,認真熱心但方向錯晒。 😅
✅ Live recovery evidence
🧪 Local regression checks so far
廣東話總結:而家部機已經返到「撳掣就開」嘅本機模式,唔使 OpenCodex connection key;程式碼修復繼續緊,會防止 Dashboard 再將 ChatGPT login 扮成欠 API key,同埋唔畀 Windows 幽靈 port 再扮看更。 👻 |
🧪 Fresh-profile runtime proof / 全新設定實機驗證Note Current state: implemented and under final verification on Evidence
Review corrections already incorporated
香港粵語同步今次唔係得個測試燈扮醒:全新獨立設定真係開到桌面版,OpenAI(Codex login)直接落咗 Ready,Needs setup 係 0,API key 提示終於唔再無端端衝出嚟做門神。🫖 而家只差完整 root 測試矩陣、最後兩輪獨立覆核、整合及遠端驗證;未完成之前唔會扮已出貨。 Recorded: 2026-08-04T23:33:07.9270661-04:00 |
📚 Documentation surfaces synchronizedNote Base-repository implementation is still uncommitted and under the complete root test matrix. This milestone covers external documentation state only.
香港粵語Repo 網站欄已經指返正式 |
🚀 Main integration published / 已經合併到 mainNote Verification state: running. The exact commit is on
What changedThe dashboard now consumes a server-authored provider configuration status instead of guessing that every provider without an API key is broken. ChatGPT/Codex forwarding, OAuth, local runtimes, loopback endpoints, and Vertex external authentication no longer receive a fake API-key setup prompt. Blank The old status logic was basically a nightclub bouncer charging localhost a cover fee. The guest list now has actual names on it. 香港粵語今次已經將真正嘅 plug-and-play 修正合併到 舊邏輯好似夜場看更見人就收不存在嘅入場費;而家終於識睇 guest list。CI 同 Squirrel release 仍然建置中,未有扮綠燈。 |
🚨 Lifecycle regression investigation resumedImportant A shipped Windows installation was found with fresh PID/runtime records but a dead process and an unreachable configured port. The proxy is healthy again after an identity-verified 🚀 Work started
🔎 Evidence established so far
Planned repair contract
Note This is a process-lifecycle defect. The primary evidence is PID ownership, listener identity, 廣東話進度 🥟今次唔再俾個 service 撳完鐘就當自己返咗工:未見到真 手動 remote IP/hostname + port 連線亦已加入今次範圍;完成後會用真 build、真測試同真 CI 證據交代,唔會靠「應該得」三個字頂住先。 |
🧩 Milestone — lifecycle matrix green; legacy dashboard cutover underwayImportant Everything described here is still branch-only, uncommitted work. No push, pull request, CI result, or release is being claimed yet. ✅ Lifecycle and fallback-port checkpointThe focused lifecycle matrix now reports 208 passed / 0 failed across 12 test files. The implementation under test covers:
Root typecheck passed before the final focused tweaks. A broader 🎨 User-requested hard cutover from the legacy dashboardA genuine capture of the installed 2.11.0 runtime confirmed that it is still serving the legacy dashboard; this is not just browser cache. The requested response is therefore a hard Material 3 cutover, not another cache-busting patch. The latest Material 3 GUI cannot be copied blindly: it spans 313 changed GUI paths and expects management routes that the current Current branch-only GUI work includes:
The preliminary remote-endpoint suite reports 9 passed / 44 assertions. Full GUI build, lint, i18n, interaction tests, backend compatibility, and real hidden-desktop capture remain pending. Why the old UI cannot remain as a fallbackKeeping both bundles would recreate the defect in a quieter costume: a healthy proxy could still serve whichever stale tree happened to be packaged. The target contract is one version-matched GUI bundle, a no-store HTML entry point, content-hashed assets, and an explicit build freshness gate so source changes cannot photograph or package yesterday's renderer. 廣東話摘要 🥟Lifecycle 嗰邊而家 208 個測試全過:restart 唔可以熄完機就扮收工,service manager 邊個揸匙就由邊個開返,direct child 亦唔准戴住 GUI 嗰邊已確認 2.11.0 真係仲送緊舊畫面,唔係 browser 鬧情緒。依家做緊完整 Material 3 換班:保留 Verification state: focused lifecycle and endpoint tests are green; full repository/GUI/runtime/CI evidence is still running or pending. |
🧪 Adversarial lifecycle review reopened the repair
The first lifecycle implementation passed its focused suites, but an independent read-only refutation found failure paths that the happy-path tests did not exercise. Work is continuing before any commit:
Material 3 and management API checkpoint
粵語進度 / Cantonese progress第一輪 lifecycle 修補雖然 focused tests 全綠,但獨立反證 review 捉到幾條真實失敗路徑:service manager 停唔到時仍有機會被當成功、兩個同時 start 可能各自開一個 proxy、dashboard restart 亦只見到 child process 出世就當健康。呢啲未修妥之前唔會 commit、push 或報 CI 成功。 Material 3 方面,source build 已經成功,backend auth matrix 亦有 139 個 tests / 1,026 個 expectations 通過;而家繼續跑完整 GUI gates,同時加 build identity 防線,避免舊 bundle 再扮新 dashboard 出貨。 Next evidence gates
|
🔐 Branch-only milestone — security review closed the obvious trapdoorsImportant Status at 2026-08-08T14:49:16-04:00: all work below is still uncommitted and unpushed on What changed
Verification so far
粵語進度 / Cantonese progress今輪唔係幫舊介面搽脂粉,而係將幾個真正危險嘅窿封實:共享 M3 原始碼而家會影響 build identity;隔籬目錄唔可以扮自己係 dashboard;裝 app、開程式同 VS Code 只可以由已知 loopback listener 做;7z 密碼亦唔再坐喺 process arguments 度周街遊。連隻 1% 點心都改做離線 emoji——一隻蝦餃唔值得向第三方報到。 不過現時仍然只係本地分支,未 commit、未 push、未過完整整合測試,所以未可以扮畢業禮。下一步係收口 lifecycle 測試、接好 CLI dispatcher,再做真正 blocked-port、stop/restart 同 package smoke。 — Automated collaborator update; no credentials, machine paths, or private runtime state included. |
🧪 Final refutation reopened three lifecycle edgesImportant This checkpoint describes uncommitted branch work. Nothing below has reached What is already verified
Three concrete lifecycle blockers found by the final read-only refuter
All three are now assigned with focused regressions. The frozen full-suite run was deliberately stopped because continuing it against code already known to require changes would produce misleading evidence. Deployment finding: same npm name, different product lineThe installed upstream CLI and this fork currently share the same npm package identity. A same-name global tarball installation is therefore revert-prone: npm can reinstall the upstream The safe urgent cutover will use a versioned portable fork build outside Next verification gates
🧧 廣東話進度今次最後反駁測試真係有料到:舊碼仲藏住三隻曱甴——半寫 lock 可以永久塞死啟動、冇 PID 都可以扮 service 仔、Task Scheduler 查唔到竟然當冇裝。三隻都已經捉到正,依家逐隻加測試再封門。 另外 npm 同名撞車都確認咗:直接全域安裝個 fork,遲啲可能俾 upstream |
🚀 Pushed repair candidate / 已推送修復候選The complete repair candidate is now pushed as 完整修復候選已推送到 What is now in the pushed commit / 已推送內容
Evidence / 驗證證據Test and build matrix
Real package and portable lifecycle proof
Visible baseline / 可見基準The captured pre-repair installation below is the genuine legacy bundle that kept reappearing. A genuine post-repair capture is not claimed yet: the required cheap headless capture provider is not available inside the current agent session, so no substitute browser or mock image will be passed off as evidence. Note Next: open the Note 下一步:開出以 |
🔎 Review and integration checkpoint / 審核及整合進度The pushed candidate is now PR #16, correctly targeting
Governance blocker
Warning The PR will not be self-approved or merged around the documented policy. Remote CI and the live portable handoff can continue independently, but default-branch integration remains honestly blocked until an eligible maintainer approves or repository permissions are corrected. PR #16 已正確指向 |
🧾 Commit-identical package receipt / 與 commit 完全一致的套件收據Important Correction to the preceding package receipt: after the first archive was tested, the cached diff gate removed one trailing blank line from an M3 source stylesheet before commit. That did not change runtime behavior, but it did change the authoritative GUI source hash. The first archive therefore remains valid behavior evidence, but it is not the artifact selected for deployment. The GUI was rebuilt from pushed commit
The PR body now carries this corrected final receipt. Earlier comments are intentionally left intact as chronological evidence rather than edited into a different past. 第一次 archive 做完 smoke 後,cached diff gate 再清走咗一行純空白;功能冇變,但 source hash 會變,所以我重新由已推送 commit build、pack 同 smoke。上表先係最終可部署收據,之前紀錄保留作時間線證據,唔會偷偷改寫歷史。 |
🧾 Yum-tong preservation checkpointThis shutdown pass has preserved and pushed the recoverable work without claiming integration:
Local gates for the substantive lanes are green where run: focused tests, typecheck, privacy scans, GUI lint/i18n, and the docs build. The main integration is not yet safe: origin/main and origin/dev diverge with conflicts, PR #16 needs maintainer/security review and a Go-port handoff, PR #14 still lacks fresh final CI/capture evidence, and open Pages/Go-port issues remain. Remote workflows for the new pushes are still in flight; no release or green default-branch verdict is claimed. 廣東話今次 shutdown pass 已經保存同 push 晒可復原工作,但未扮 integration 完成。各 lane 都有真 commit 同本地 gate 證據;main/dev 仲有實際 merge conflicts,PR #16 要 maintainer/security review 同 Go-port handoff,PR #14 仲欠 final CI/capture,Pages 同 Go-port issues 亦未收口。新 pushes 嘅 workflows 仲行緊,未有 release 或 default branch green 結論。 |

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🚀 Plug-and-play startup repair
Important
Work started at 2026-08-04T22:31:37-04:00 on main. The objective is a real one-action local start: a normal local user must not need to understand or supply an OpenCodex admission API key, while deliberate LAN exposure stays authenticated.
Current evidence
All reactions