Skip to content

Conversation

@sid597
Copy link
Collaborator

@sid597 sid597 commented Sep 6, 2025

@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Sep 6, 2025

@supabase
Copy link

supabase bot commented Sep 6, 2025

This pull request has been ignored for the connected project zytfjzqyijgagqxrzbmz because there are no changes detected in packages/database/supabase directory. You can change this behaviour in Project Integrations Settings ↗︎.


Preview Branches by Supabase.
Learn more about Supabase Branching ↗︎.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

sid597 commented Sep 6, 2025

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@sid597 sid597 mentioned this pull request Sep 6, 2025
@sid597 sid597 changed the title handle node tags with # in front and update placeholder to use # Roam: ENG-693 handle node tags with # in front and update placeholder to use # Sep 6, 2025
@sid597 sid597 marked this pull request as ready for review September 6, 2025 09:05
@sid597 sid597 force-pushed the eng-693-handle-in-tag branch from dfcb44b to 94c5a08 Compare September 6, 2025 09:30
@sid597 sid597 requested a review from mdroidian September 7, 2025 11:45
@sid597 sid597 force-pushed the eng-693-handle-in-tag branch from 7610dad to b7e7d4f Compare September 7, 2025 16:13
Copy link
Contributor

@mdroidian mdroidian left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This works, but ideally we sanitize the data right when it is input. (so when we call getDiscourseNodes or nodeConfig), that way we can sanitize it just once and always know we are using the same data format.

@sid597 sid597 force-pushed the eng-693-handle-in-tag branch from d7c0aca to a4215ff Compare September 8, 2025 12:29
@sid597 sid597 force-pushed the eng-737-use-node-color-to-style-node-tags branch from c835f68 to 4345e2a Compare September 8, 2025 12:29
@sid597 sid597 force-pushed the eng-693-handle-in-tag branch from a4215ff to ee6ebdf Compare September 8, 2025 12:31
@sid597 sid597 force-pushed the eng-737-use-node-color-to-style-node-tags branch from 4345e2a to df5f0b8 Compare September 8, 2025 12:31
@sid597 sid597 merged commit fb1b619 into eng-737-use-node-color-to-style-node-tags Sep 8, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Done in General Sep 8, 2025
sid597 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
* modify dom only for node tags

* add background color to a nodetag

* use it as color not background color

* remove unused refresh

* Roam: ENG-693 handle node tags with # in front and update placeholder to use # (#420)

* use text not tag

* Move the new block as first child of the current block (#422)
sid597 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
* use getDiscourseNodes

* Eng-737 use node color to style node tags (#424)

* modify dom only for node tags

* add background color to a nodetag

* use it as color not background color

* remove unused refresh

* Roam: ENG-693 handle node tags with # in front and update placeholder to use # (#420)

* use text not tag

* Move the new block as first child of the current block (#422)
trangdoan982 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2025
* use getDiscourseNodes

* Eng-737 use node color to style node tags (#424)

* modify dom only for node tags

* add background color to a nodetag

* use it as color not background color

* remove unused refresh

* Roam: ENG-693 handle node tags with # in front and update placeholder to use # (#420)

* use text not tag

* Move the new block as first child of the current block (#422)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

No open projects
Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants