Skip to content

fix(kms): synchronize authorization Bun locks - #941

Open
kvinwang wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
codex/fix-kms-auth-locks
Open

fix(kms): synchronize authorization Bun locks#941
kvinwang wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
codex/fix-kms-auth-locks

Conversation

@kvinwang

@kvinwang kvinwang commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Problem

The KMS authorization JavaScript workspace carried Bun lockfiles that did not agree with its declared dependencies. A clean install could resolve a different graph or fail the frozen-lock check used in CI/deployment.

Root cause and fix

Regenerate/synchronize the Bun locks from the declared authorization dependencies so clean installs are deterministic.

Implementation

The branch records the following focused implementation work:

  • fix(kms): synchronize authorization Bun locks

Changed paths:

  • dstack/kms/auth-eth-bun/bun.lock
  • dstack/kms/auth-simple/bun.lock

Scope

This PR addresses one logical kms finding. It intentionally excludes the acceptance-test infrastructure from #841 and unrelated product fixes from #840.

Dependency and merge order

This PR is based directly on master and does not require another split product PR to merge first.

Verification

  • git diff --check origin/master..origin/codex/fix-kms-auth-locks: passed.
  • The declared base was verified as an ancestor of the PR head.
  • Focused compile/check verification was run for the changed component where applicable; non-Rust packaging or configuration changes were reviewed against their exact branch delta.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 31, 2026 03:22

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants