Skip to content

Set MED_model to cmeps, not cesm#682

Merged
billsacks merged 2 commits into
ESCOMP:mainfrom
billsacks:med_model
Jul 21, 2026
Merged

Set MED_model to cmeps, not cesm#682
billsacks merged 2 commits into
ESCOMP:mainfrom
billsacks:med_model

Conversation

@billsacks

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description of changes

Set MED_model to cmeps, not cesm

This makes more sense given how it's used - in printing the various
component names to the mediator log file. This is also consistent with
what's done for UFS.

This resolves the main point in #680. I have not addressed the possibly redundant cime_model that was raised in later discussion in that issue.

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any:

CMEPS Issues Fixed (include github issue #):

Are changes expected to change answers? (specify if bfb, different at roundoff, more substantial) no

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? MED_model is cmeps, not cesm

Testing performed

aux_cime_baselines in the context of cesm3_0_alpha09d. For this testing, I used this branch on top of the fix_noresm_coupling_mode branch. Tests pass (except expected failures) and are bit-for-bit.

This makes more sense given how it's used - in printing the various
component names to the mediator log file. This is also consistent with
what's done for UFS.

Resolves ESCOMP#680
@billsacks
billsacks requested a review from mvertens July 20, 2026 22:21
@billsacks
billsacks merged commit d488618 into ESCOMP:main Jul 21, 2026
1 check passed
@billsacks
billsacks deleted the med_model branch July 21, 2026 15:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

MED_model vs. coupling_mode

2 participants