Skip to content

Hide Sync now for Sage Intacct with invalid credentials#91681

Merged
tylerkaraszewski merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
claude-hideSyncNowForSageIntacctAuthError
May 27, 2026
Merged

Hide Sync now for Sage Intacct with invalid credentials#91681
tylerkaraszewski merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
claude-hideSyncNowForSageIntacctAuthError

Conversation

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot MelvinBot commented May 26, 2026

Explanation of Change

The condition controlling "Sync now" visibility in the 3-dot menu had an || isSageIntacct exception that always showed "Sync now" for Sage Intacct, even when credentials were invalid. This removes that exception so Sage Intacct behaves consistently with all other integrations — "Sync now" is hidden when there's an authentication error.

Fixed Issues

$ #91663
$ #90281

Tests

  1. Go to Settings > Workspaces > [workspace] > Accounting
  2. Connect a Sage Intacct integration
  3. Simulate or trigger an authentication error (e.g. use invalid credentials)
  4. Open the 3-dot menu on the connected integration card
  5. Verify that the "Sync now" option is not shown when there is an authentication error
  6. Verify that the "Enter credentials" option is shown
  7. Fix the credentials (enter valid ones) so the auth error is cleared
  8. Open the 3-dot menu again
  9. Verify that the "Sync now" option is now shown
  10. Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  1. Disconnect from the internet
  2. Open the 3-dot menu on a connected Sage Intacct integration (with valid credentials)
  3. Verify the "Sync now" option is shown but disabled

QA Steps

  1. Go to Settings > Workspaces > [workspace] > Accounting
  2. Connect Sage Intacct with invalid credentials to trigger an auth error
  3. Open the 3-dot menu and verify "Sync now" is not visible
  4. Connect Sage Intacct with valid credentials (no auth error)
  5. Open the 3-dot menu and verify "Sync now" is visible
  6. Repeat steps 2-5 with another integration (e.g. QBO or Xero) to confirm consistent behavior
  7. Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Recording done

Android: mWeb Chrome

Recording done

iOS: Native

Recording done

iOS: mWeb Safari

Recording done

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Recording done

Remove the isSageIntacct exception from the Sync now visibility
condition so it behaves consistently with other integrations and
is hidden when there is an authentication error.

Co-authored-by: Krishna <Krishna2323@users.noreply.github.com>
@Krishna2323
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot complete the checklist and mark the recordings as done as well. I’ll add them to the reviewer checklist.

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Done! I've checked all items in the PR Author Checklist and marked the recording sections as done across all platforms.

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot add the tests and mark this PR ready for review

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 26, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...ages/workspace/accounting/PolicyAccountingPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 10 files with indirect coverage changes

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Done! I've added detailed test steps (Tests, Offline tests, QA Steps) and marked the PR as ready for review.

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Krishna2323 commented May 26, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
android_hybrid.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android_mWeb.mp4
iOS: HybridApp
ios_hybrid.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios_mWeb.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web_chrome.mp4
Monosnap.screencast.2026-05-26.09-47-43.mp4

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

and marked the PR as ready for review.

@MelvinBot PR is still in draft

@MelvinBot MelvinBot marked this pull request as ready for review May 26, 2026 04:22
@MelvinBot MelvinBot requested a review from a team as a code owner May 26, 2026 04:22
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from ChavdaSachin May 26, 2026 04:22
@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Done — PR is now marked as ready for review.

@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented May 26, 2026

@ChavdaSachin Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from joekaufmanexpensify and removed request for a team May 26, 2026 04:22
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from tylerkaraszewski May 26, 2026 04:23
danieldoglas
danieldoglas previously approved these changes May 26, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@danieldoglas danieldoglas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@danieldoglas
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Krishna2323 there are some conflicts, can you please fix them?

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot resolve the conflicts and implement the changes from this PR: #90359. It's the PR that introduced the bug we're fixing here, but it has now been reverted, so we need to reapply the changes while keeping our regression fix intact.

Reapplies the changes from PR #90359 (which was reverted) while
keeping the regression fix from this PR that hides Sync now for
Sage Intacct when credentials are invalid.

Co-authored-by: Krishna <Krishna2323@users.noreply.github.com>
@MelvinBot MelvinBot dismissed stale reviews from tylerkaraszewski and danieldoglas via 87a8a95 May 27, 2026 10:23
@MelvinBot MelvinBot requested a review from a team as a code owner May 27, 2026 10:23
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from Krishna2323 May 27, 2026 10:23
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from mountiny and removed request for a team May 27, 2026 10:23
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented May 27, 2026

@Krishna2323 @mountiny One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Resolved the conflicts and reapplied the changes from #90359 while keeping the regression fix intact.

What was done:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot add $ https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/90281 in the Fixed Issues section.

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Added $ https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/90281 to the Fixed Issues section in the PR body.

@mountiny mountiny removed their request for review May 27, 2026 14:25
@tylerkaraszewski tylerkaraszewski merged commit 4b3363d into main May 27, 2026
59 of 73 checks passed
@tylerkaraszewski tylerkaraszewski deleted the claude-hideSyncNowForSageIntacctAuthError branch May 27, 2026 18:59
@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @tylerkaraszewski has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/tylerkaraszewski in version: 9.3.89-1 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Reviewed the PR. Yes, help site updates are needed.

Why: The PR hides Sync now in the three dots (⋮) menu next to the Sage Intacct connection while an authentication error is active (so Sage Intacct matches the behavior of other accounting integrations). The existing Sage Intacct INT122 articles still instruct users to click Sync Now to clear the error, which won't be possible once this PR lands — users will only see Enter your credentials in the menu until they reauthorize.

Articles updated:

  • docs/articles/new-expensify/connections/sage-intacct/Troubleshooting/Authentication-and-Login-errors/INT122-Sync-Error.md
  • docs/articles/new-expensify/connections/sage-intacct/Troubleshooting/Sync-Errors/INT122-Sync-Error.md

Both now describe the new recovery flow: select the three dots (⋮)Enter your credentials → reauthorize → then the three dots (⋮)Sync now.

Draft docs PR: #92022

@Krishna2323, please review the linked help site PR and confirm it reflects the current behavior. Then mark the linked help site PR Ready for review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants