Skip to content

Allow workspace and status filter to be negatable#95023

Open
bernhardoj wants to merge 35 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
bernhardoj:feat/93208-negatable-workspace-and-status
Open

Allow workspace and status filter to be negatable#95023
bernhardoj wants to merge 35 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
bernhardoj:feat/93208-negatable-workspace-and-status

Conversation

@bernhardoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #93208
PROPOSAL:

Tests

Same as QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as QA Steps

QA Steps

  1. Go to Spend
  2. Press the search button
  3. Type a negated (with - prefix) status and/or workspace filter (e.g., -status:draft, -workspace:"My workspace 1")
  4. Verify the search shows the result without the negated value
  5. Clear the filters
  6. Apply the filter normally (without negation) and verify it shows the result with the selected status and/or workspace
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.2.mp4

@bernhardoj bernhardoj requested review from a team as code owners July 1, 2026 06:04
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from aimane-chnaif and flaviadefaria and removed request for a team and flaviadefaria July 1, 2026 06:04
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@aimane-chnaif Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team July 1, 2026 06:04
Comment thread src/components/Search/FilterComponents/CategorySelector.tsx Outdated
Comment thread src/components/Search/FilterComponents/TagSelector.tsx Outdated

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: d15fbc7a5b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/types/form/SearchAdvancedFiltersForm.ts
Comment thread src/libs/SearchParser/searchParser.peggy
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/CONST/index.ts 94.81% <ø> (ø)
...ch/FilterComponents/AdvancedFilters/FilterList.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...omponents/Search/FilterComponents/TypeSelector.tsx 45.00% <ø> (ø)
src/components/Search/SearchResultsProvider.tsx 76.92% <ø> (ø)
src/components/Search/hooks/useSearchSnapshot.ts 87.50% <100.00%> (ø)
...c/components/Search/hooks/useUpdateFilterQuery.tsx 46.15% <ø> (ø)
src/hooks/useAdvancedSearchFilters.ts 97.91% <100.00%> (ø)
src/hooks/useAutocompleteSuggestions.ts 62.75% <100.00%> (ø)
src/hooks/useExportedToFilterOptions.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/hooks/useSearchBulkActions.ts 53.85% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
... and 31 more
... and 16 files with indirect coverage changes

@bernhardoj bernhardoj mentioned this pull request Jul 1, 2026
43 tasks
@bernhardoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@aimane-chnaif let's merge the text filter validation PR first, so we can resolve some of the type/lint error here.

@JS00001 JS00001 self-requested a review July 1, 2026 16:04
@bernhardoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@aimane-chnaif ready for your review

@aimane-chnaif

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Conflicts again

@aimane-chnaif

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Every card's "View transactions" now shows a spurious status:all filter

query: buildCannedSearchQuery({type: CONST.SEARCH.DATA_TYPES.EXPENSE, status: CONST.SEARCH.STATUS.EXPENSE.ALL, cardID}),

status: CONST.SEARCH.STATUS.EXPENSE.ALL,

The PR removed the parser's status:"all" → "" normalization and made status an ordinary filter, but left buildCannedSearchQuery and its callers untouched both — still pass status: CONST.SEARCH.STATUS.EXPENSE.ALL.
These callers feed the "View transactions" entry points (Wallet, Expensify Card, company card details, navigateToCardTransactions).

  • Before: type:expense expense-type:card card:X → no status filter.
  • After: …card:X status:all → a "Status" filter pill the user never set. Since all isn't a real option in the status picker, the pill can't be reconciled (picker shows nothing selected), and status:all is now sent to the backend as a literal filter. (Client-side list rendering survives because expenseStatusActionMapping['all'] === () => true)

Fix recommendation: update these callers to stop passing status, or restore the normalization.

Comment on lines -537 to -542
orderedQuery += ` ${CONST.SEARCH.SYNTAX_ROOT_KEYS.STATUS}:${Array.isArray(query.status) ? query.status.join(',') : query.status}`;
orderedQuery += ` ${CONST.SEARCH.SYNTAX_ROOT_KEYS.GROUP_BY}:${query.groupBy}`;

if (query.policyID) {
orderedQuery += ` ${CONST.SEARCH.SYNTAX_FILTER_KEYS.POLICY_ID}:${Array.isArray(query.policyID) ? query.policyID.join(',') : query.policyID} `;
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug or expected?: Existing saved & recent searches orphaned after deploy

Removing status, policyID from orderedQuery changes primaryHash for every query.
Saved searches persist keyed by that hash and match the active view

if (Number(key) === queryJSON?.hash) {

so pre-existing entries stop highlighting as active and re-saving duplicates them.

No migration in frontend so confirm the backend re-keys nvp_savedSearches/nvp_recentSearches.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Definitely not expected. Updated to preserve the order

Comment on lines -1447 to -1459
if (typeKey) {
if (Array.isArray(queryJSON.status)) {
const validStatuses = queryJSON.status.filter((status) => Object.values(CONST.SEARCH.STATUS[typeKey as keyof typeof CONST.SEARCH.DATA_TYPES]).includes(status));

if (validStatuses.length) {
filtersForm[FILTER_KEYS.STATUS] = queryJSON.status.join(',');
} else {
filtersForm[FILTER_KEYS.STATUS] = CONST.SEARCH.STATUS.EXPENSE.ALL;
}
} else {
filtersForm[FILTER_KEYS.STATUS] = queryJSON.status;
}
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor: Invalid/stale status persists in the filter form

Status validation against CONST.SEARCH.STATUS[typeKey] + ALL fallback was dropped so a query invalid for its type (e.g. type:invoice status:approved) now keeps the bad value and re-serializes it silently.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we need to keep this. buildFilterFormValuesFromQuery is used to synchronize the queryJSON to the SEARCH_ADVANCED_FILTERS_FORM onyx data. First, it only handles fallback to ALL when the invalid status is more than 1. It's also inconsistent, the queryJSON filter will still contain the invalid filters and send to the BE, but the FE only onyx data replaces it with ALL (an empty string)

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 0fe57537e6

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/libs/SearchUIUtils.ts
const sortedQueryJSONStatus = Array.isArray(status) ? status.sort().join(',') : status;
const isDataLoaded =
(searchResults?.data != null || searchResults?.errors != null) && searchResults?.search?.type === queryJSON?.type && sortedSearchResultStatus === sortedQueryJSONStatus;
const isDataLoaded = (searchResults?.data != null || searchResults?.errors != null) && searchResults?.search?.type === queryJSON?.type && searchResults.search.hash === queryJSON?.hash;

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Include the hash on failed search snapshots

When a search request fails, getOnyxLoadingData() writes a snapshot with errors and search.type but no search.hash (checked src/libs/actions/Search.ts). Since this check now requires searchResults.search.hash === queryJSON.hash, failed snapshots never count as loaded; useSearchPageSetup() then sees isSnapshotDataLoaded === false and isLoading === false and immediately fires search() again, so backend/transient failures retry in a loop instead of showing the error state. Include the hash in failure snapshots or tolerate error snapshots without it.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

queryJSON.hash is the current query json hash and searchResults.search.hash is from the BE response. I don't think we should update it optimistically. Only after the search is done, BE then return the hash. It's the same with status. We don't optimistically update the status in getOnyxLoadingData

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, when it fails, an error view will be shown.

Comment thread src/libs/SearchQueryUtils.ts Outdated
@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🤖 Review

Solid, coherent refactor that promotes status/policyID from root query keys to regular negatable flat filters (*Not form keys serialized with a - prefix). The negation logic in the selectors and section builders is correct, the round‑trip parse → form → serialize is intact, the PolicyUtilsSearchQueryUtils move is clean, and the deleted status: ALL / policyID: undefined test assertions are justified by the schema change (not coverage loss). New negation round‑trip coverage in SearchParserTest / SearchQueryUtilsTest / SearchUpdateTest is strong.

Two things I'd want resolved before this merges, plus a validation gap and some noise to clear.

🔴 1. Confirm existing saved/recent searches aren't orphaned by the hash change

getQueryHashes no longer appends status/policyID into orderedQuery explicitly — they now flow through flatFilters, which changes both content and ordering of the hashed string (SearchQueryUtils.ts:544). So primaryHash and recentSearchHash change for every pre‑existing query that contains a status or workspace clause. Saved searches are stored keyed by the hash computed at save time and the active one is matched via Number(key) === hash (SavedSearchList.tsx:72); after deploy those stop matching, so a previously‑saved status/workspace search no longer highlights as active (it still opens via its stored query string). There's no frontend migration.

This is the same concern aimane-chnaif raised. Since the linked issue is labeled Internal, this is presumably paired with a backend re‑key of nvp_savedSearches / nvp_recentSearches — please confirm that migration exists, otherwise existing saved searches silently lose their active state.

🔴 2. Point me to where negated status/policyID render a filter‑bar chip

When a user applies -status:draft or -workspace:"X", the value is stored under statusNot / policyIDNot. The filter bar builds chips by iterating the form and looking up key in FILTER_VIEW_MAP (SearchUIUtils.ts:5581), but FILTER_VIEW_MAP contains only the base status/policyID keys — no *Not entries, and there's no label normalization from statusNotstatus. In this branch that path yields label = undefined, so the negated filter appears to produce no chip (and can't be removed/edited from the bar). getDisplayValue was updated to return a value for POLICY_ID_NOT (:5473), which suggests the display was intended to work, but the label lookup still drops it.

You replied that this is "handled on the first PR" — I traced the bar path (useSearchFiltersBar.tsx:147mapFiltersFormToLabelValueList) and couldn't find that handling in this branch, and mapFiltersFormToLabelValueList has no test covering a negated chip. Could you point to the exact commit/code so this can be verified? If it genuinely lives in an already‑merged PR I'm happy to be wrong — a quick manual repro (apply -status:draft, check the bar shows a chip) would settle it.

🟡 3. Type‑scoped status validation was dropped

The old buildFilterFormValuesFromQuery validated status against the query's type and fell back to ALL; the new code writes the raw values with no validation (SearchQueryUtils.ts status branch). The only remaining check is autocomplete's statusList = userFriendlyStatusList (SearchAutocompleteUtils.ts:216), which is the union of all statuses across types — not type‑scoped. So a status valid for a different type (e.g. type:invoice status:approved, or a stale value from a saved search/deep link) now persists in the form and re‑serializes silently instead of being coerced. The status = undefined reset on type change (useUpdateFilterQuery.tsx) only covers the in‑UI type‑switch case. Matches aimane-chnaif's note — worth a test for the cross‑type case.

🟢 4. The two PERF‑13 bot comments are false positives

Both github-actions PERF‑13 flags target the removed code, not the new code. The new selectors already hoist the mapped key Set outside the .filter() callback — CategorySelector.tsx:62 and TagSelector.tsx:37 — exactly what the bot suggested. No change needed; the pattern doesn't recur in the other selectors.

Minor / non‑blocking (P3)
  • Empty status selection semantics changed. The old special‑case mapping an empty status selection back to STATUS.EXPENSE.ALL was removed in MultiSelectFilterComponents; deselecting all statuses now yields [] ("unfiltered") instead of ALL. Intentional under the new model, but worth confirming product intent.
  • getFilterFromQuery derives isNegated from .at(0) while buildFilterFormValuesFromQuery uses .some(...). For a mixed‑operator clause like status:a -status:b these disagree and the positive value can be silently dropped. Unusual input, low severity.
  • Dead branch: useExportedToFilterOptions.ts checks policyIDs.value?.length === 0, but getFilterFromQuery returns value: undefined (never []) when the filter is absent, so that branch never fires. Harmless, slightly misleading.
  • Several hardcoded hash literals in tests were regenerated from the changed getQueryHashes; trust CI green rather than the values by eye.
How this was reviewed

Fanned out three focused reviewers over the core query logic, the type/form model, and the UI+tests; every finding above was then re‑verified directly against the PR‑branch checkout (0fe5753). Confidence: high on 1–4; the chip issue (2) is the one place the author's claim and the code I can see disagree, so it's framed as "please confirm" rather than asserted.

Comment thread src/components/Search/FilterComponents/CategorySelector.tsx Outdated
Comment thread src/components/Search/FilterComponents/TagSelector.tsx Outdated
return policyID.value.map((id) => policyData?.[`${key}${id}`]).filter((data): data is NonNullable<typeof data> => !!data);
}

function getAllPolicyValuesMap<T extends OnyxCollectionKey>(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is near-identical to getAllPolicyValues.
The only difference is array-push vs keyed-assign.
getAllPolicyValues can be Object.values(getAllPolicyValuesMap(policyID, key, data)), removing ~30 duplicated lines and the risk that the id-stripping (replace only kills the first occurrence) diverges between them.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I intentionally created 2 variants to be more optimized (considering policies can be large). If we do Object.values(getAllPolicyValuesMap(policyID, key, data)), we create the object first and then iterate to create the array. It'll be easier to maintain though, but I think this function won't change that much.

Comment thread src/libs/SearchUIUtils.ts Outdated
Comment thread src/libs/SearchQueryUtils.ts Outdated
Comment thread src/hooks/useExportedToFilterOptions.ts Outdated
Comment thread src/libs/SearchQueryUtils.ts Outdated
@bernhardoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Every card's "View transactions" now shows a spurious status:all filter

Can't reproduce. STATUS.EXPENSE.ALL is an empty string, not "all". I've removed all usages of it.

@bernhardoj bernhardoj requested a review from aimane-chnaif July 9, 2026 11:52
@aimane-chnaif

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@aimane-chnaif

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Knip check failed

@bernhardoj

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants