Skip to content

DeepLaw v0.10.0 — Quality and Superiority Closure

Choose a tag to compare

@github-actions github-actions released this 30 Jul 04:29
bb66614

DeepLaw v0.10.0 release notes

DeepLaw v0.10.0 completes the engineering portion of the 1.0 Quality and Superiority Closure
milestone. DeepLaw 2.0 remains the product brand; it is not the package version.

Machine decisions:

commercial_release_eligible=true
quality_protocol_eligible=true
competitive_claim_eligible=false

Delivered

  • DeepLaw Evaluation Protocol v1 with public Benchmark, fixed component weights and thresholds,
    non-averagable hard failures, and an explicitly non-secret time-frozen holdout.
  • Actual autonomy/security cases over the shipped commit coordinator, grant policy, lifecycle,
    retrieval, disclosure controls, and Ledger hash chain.
  • Actual source-bound bilingual deterministic-v2 Typed Compiler quality scoring.
  • One offline runner that generates the complete summary, four component reports, a readable report,
    functional scoring digest, and checksum inventory; a second mode independently verifies every
    emitted byte.
  • Release eligibility bound to a clean strict post-freeze commit and the exact candidate wheel
    SHA-256. Source-tree reports remain development-only.
  • Evaluation artifacts included in the release manifest, root checksums, Sigstore OIDC inputs, and
    GitHub provenance attestations.
  • Commercial release manifest v3 with an explicit quality_protocol_eligible decision and corrected
    comparative evidence gaps.
  • Restored DeepLaw 2.0 product imagery and synchronized bilingual branding, version identity,
    architecture explanation, examples, keywords, and evidence boundaries.

Corrected route

The prior requirement for evaluator-secret data and signatures from two independent institutions
has been retired as the DeepLaw core quality and release gate. A signature authenticates a key and
bytes; it does not by itself prove correctness, independence, or Authority. Independent
replication remains optional.

Historical external-evaluation schemas and runners are retained for reproducibility and optional
comparative use. The v0.7 proposal/review implementation is likewise retained for source-derived
compilation, untrusted imports, migration, rollback, and compatibility. Neither route is the
default for admitted Agent-derived knowledge.

Claim boundary

The exact release can state that it passed DeepLaw Evaluation Protocol v1. It cannot state that:

  • the public holdout was secret, unseen, or contamination-free;
  • deterministic typed extraction proves model cross-document synthesis;
  • no future task can fail;
  • DeepLaw is better than a named system that was not executed.

Real Codex, Claude Code, and OpenCode model tasks, actual same-condition named-baseline runs, paired
confidence intervals, and complete comparative cost/failure records remain absent. Therefore
competitive_claim_eligible=false.

Upgrade

No autonomous Ledger schema change is required from v0.9.0. Before upgrading, create and verify an
explicit snapshot. Install the exact v0.10.0 wheel, run deeplaw knowledge doctor and
deeplaw knowledge autonomy verify, then rebuild only the derived layer. See
INSTALL_UPGRADE_ROLLBACK.md.

Rollback restores the pre-upgrade snapshot before installing v0.9.0. Do not point an older binary
at a Vault whose canonical state has changed after the snapshot.