docs: Show HN — result-only wording for the editor answer - #107
Conversation
The VS Code cut was an internal decision; the post answers "is there an extension" with what exists (standard LSP server, any editor attaches) instead of why something was removed. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 31 minutes You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
1 participant
The editor answer in comment-prep now states what exists (standard LSP server, any LSP-capable editor attaches, VS Code included) instead of describing the extension removal — internal decisions stay out of the post.
Docs only.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code