docs(specs): bootstrap spec and roadmap flow#211
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces foundational documentation for ecosystem roadmap specifications. Three new files establish a framework for defining, tracking, and generating roadmaps: a main roadmap file, a specification document outlining the approach, and a tasks checklist for implementation. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Project Scorecard |
Forge AI Quality Gate✅ Passed — Score 100/100 (A+) · Delta +0 · 0 new findings Category scores
Powered by Forge AI Action · forgespace.co |
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/specs/2026-04-15-ecosystem-roadmap-specs/tasks.md (1)
6-6: Make retrieval verification explicit for both source types.Line 6 should require validating both
source_type=specandsource_type=roadmap; using “or” can mask partial indexing failures.Proposed wording change
-- [ ] Verify RAG returns this spec via source_type=spec or roadmap +- [ ] Verify RAG returns this spec via both source_type=spec and source_type=roadmap🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@docs/specs/2026-04-15-ecosystem-roadmap-specs/tasks.md` at line 6, Change the checklist item so it explicitly requires validating retrieval for both source types rather than using “or”: replace the line “[ ] Verify RAG returns this spec via source_type=spec or roadmap” with an explicit dual check such as “[ ] Verify RAG returns this spec via source_type=spec and source_type=roadmap” (or two separate checklist entries) to ensure both retrieval paths are validated.docs/roadmap.md (1)
3-3: Clarify generation provenance to prevent manual drift.Line 3 says this file is auto-regenerated, but the file doesn’t point to a generator command/script. Add a “do not edit manually” note plus generation source so updates stay reproducible.
Proposed doc tweak
-_Auto-regenerated 2026-04-15 from `docs/specs/`._ +_Auto-regenerated 2026-04-15 from `docs/specs/` (do not edit manually; regenerate via the specs→roadmap workflow)._🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@docs/roadmap.md` at line 3, Update the autogenerated header string "_Auto-regenerated 2026-04-15 from `docs/specs/`._" to include a "DO NOT EDIT MANUALLY" note and the authoritative generation command or script (e.g., the exact npm/Makefile command or script path) and the source directory so the provenance is explicit; edit the header in docs/roadmap.md to read something like "DO NOT EDIT MANUALLY — auto-regenerated from `docs/specs/` on 2026-04-15 via: <generator command or script>" so future updates are reproducible and clearly attributed.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/specs/2026-04-15-ecosystem-roadmap-specs/spec.md`:
- Line 5: The frontmatter contains an empty pr key; update the frontmatter by
either populating the pr field with the spec PR URL (e.g., "pr: https://...") or
remove the pr key entirely until a PR exists so downstream parsers don't see an
empty value—look for the frontmatter entry named pr in the spec.md and ensure it
is non-empty or omitted.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@docs/roadmap.md`:
- Line 3: Update the autogenerated header string "_Auto-regenerated 2026-04-15
from `docs/specs/`._" to include a "DO NOT EDIT MANUALLY" note and the
authoritative generation command or script (e.g., the exact npm/Makefile command
or script path) and the source directory so the provenance is explicit; edit the
header in docs/roadmap.md to read something like "DO NOT EDIT MANUALLY —
auto-regenerated from `docs/specs/` on 2026-04-15 via: <generator command or
script>" so future updates are reproducible and clearly attributed.
In `@docs/specs/2026-04-15-ecosystem-roadmap-specs/tasks.md`:
- Line 6: Change the checklist item so it explicitly requires validating
retrieval for both source types rather than using “or”: replace the line “[ ]
Verify RAG returns this spec via source_type=spec or roadmap” with an explicit
dual check such as “[ ] Verify RAG returns this spec via source_type=spec and
source_type=roadmap” (or two separate checklist entries) to ensure both
retrieval paths are validated.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 6b557ba4-13f9-414a-a861-17759d52dec2
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
docs/roadmap.mddocs/specs/2026-04-15-ecosystem-roadmap-specs/spec.mddocs/specs/2026-04-15-ecosystem-roadmap-specs/tasks.md
| status: proposed | ||
| created: 2026-04-15 | ||
| owner: lucassantana | ||
| pr: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid empty pr metadata in frontmatter.
Line 5 leaves pr blank, which is ambiguous for downstream parsing and traceability. Populate it with the spec PR URL (or remove the key until available).
Proposed frontmatter fix
-pr:
+pr: https://github.com/Forge-Space/core/pull/211📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| pr: | |
| pr: https://github.com/Forge-Space/core/pull/211 |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@docs/specs/2026-04-15-ecosystem-roadmap-specs/spec.md` at line 5, The
frontmatter contains an empty pr key; update the frontmatter by either
populating the pr field with the spec PR URL (e.g., "pr: https://...") or remove
the pr key entirely until a PR exists so downstream parsers don't see an empty
value—look for the frontmatter entry named pr in the spec.md and ensure it is
non-empty or omitted.
1 participant
Summary
Verification
Summary by CodeRabbit