docs(specs): bootstrap spec + roadmap flow#212
Conversation
Seeds the docs/specs/<date>-<slug>/ structure and derived docs/roadmap.md. Generator: ~/.claude/rag-index/specs.py (personal tooling). See: companion ai-dev-toolkit/kit/specs/ for the flow. No runtime impact.
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 55 minutes and 0 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request establishes a roadmap specification system by updating the core roadmap file and introducing new placeholder spec documentation. It defines the workflow for managing future feature work using dated markdown files with YAML frontmatter, where the roadmap is regenerated from spec entries based on their status. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~4 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Forge AI Quality Gate✅ Passed — Score 100/100 (A+) · Delta +0 · 0 new findings Category scores
Powered by Forge AI Action · forgespace.co |
Project Scorecard |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/specs/2026-04-15-roadmap-placeholder/spec.md (1)
1-7: Consider populating thepr:field.The
pr:field in the YAML frontmatter is empty. Since this spec is being introduced in PR#212, consider populating it with the PR number for better traceability and completeness of the spec metadata.📝 Proposed enhancement
--- status: proposed created: 2026-04-15 owner: lucassantana -pr: +pr: 212 tags: placeholder ---🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@docs/specs/2026-04-15-roadmap-placeholder/spec.md` around lines 1 - 7, The YAML frontmatter is missing the PR reference in the pr: field; update the frontmatter in spec.md by setting pr: 212 (or the appropriate PR number) so the metadata includes the PR that introduced this spec—look for the YAML block beginning with --- and the pr: key and add the PR number as its value.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In `@docs/specs/2026-04-15-roadmap-placeholder/spec.md`:
- Around line 1-7: The YAML frontmatter is missing the PR reference in the pr:
field; update the frontmatter in spec.md by setting pr: 212 (or the appropriate
PR number) so the metadata includes the PR that introduced this spec—look for
the YAML block beginning with --- and the pr: key and add the PR number as its
value.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 959cb77a-5757-4527-9089-dc3230b51bac
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
docs/roadmap.mddocs/specs/2026-04-15-roadmap-placeholder/spec.mddocs/specs/2026-04-15-roadmap-placeholder/tasks.md
|



Seeds the per-feature spec + derived roadmap flow (see companion
ai-dev-toolkit/kit/specs/README.md). One placeholder spec + auto-generateddocs/roadmap.md. Docs only. No runtime impact.Summary by CodeRabbit