Skip to content

fix: correct gcloud storage ACL syntax in GCS release scripts - #4519

Merged
whowes merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
whowes/fix-gcloud-acl-syntax
Jul 15, 2026
Merged

fix: correct gcloud storage ACL syntax in GCS release scripts#4519
whowes merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
whowes/fix-gcloud-acl-syntax

Conversation

@whowes

@whowes whowes commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

After #4493 the scripts fail with errors like "Bad syntax for dict arg: [allUsers:READ]"

See also https://docs.cloud.google.com/storage/docs/gsutil-transition-to-gcloud

@whowes
whowes requested a review from jinseopkim0 July 14, 2026 21:51

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the GCS release scripts for jib-cli, jib-gradle-plugin, and jib-maven-plugin to use the correct syntax for the gcloud storage objects update command's --add-acl-grant flag, changing it to entity=allUsers,role=READER. I have no further feedback to provide as there are no review comments.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

@whowes whowes changed the title fix: update gcloud storage ACL syntax in GCS release scripts fix: correct gcloud storage ACL syntax in GCS release scripts Jul 14, 2026
@whowes
whowes merged commit 9f6f88e into master Jul 15, 2026
15 of 17 checks passed
@whowes
whowes deleted the whowes/fix-gcloud-acl-syntax branch July 15, 2026 17:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants