Skip to content

[hl] Consider _ prefix when checking reserved keywords#12090

Merged
Simn merged 1 commit intodevelopmentfrom
hl_underscore_keywords
Mar 28, 2025
Merged

[hl] Consider _ prefix when checking reserved keywords#12090
Simn merged 1 commit intodevelopmentfrom
hl_underscore_keywords

Conversation

@Simn
Copy link
Member

@Simn Simn commented Mar 27, 2025

For #12089

@yuxiaomao
Copy link
Contributor

Seems good for me. However it seems that MSVC does not complain about the _Complex keyword x)

@Simn
Copy link
Member Author

Simn commented Mar 28, 2025

Well, our benchmarks will tell us if this works I suppose.

@Simn Simn merged commit 0a60f04 into development Mar 28, 2025
130 of 131 checks passed
@Simn Simn deleted the hl_underscore_keywords branch March 28, 2025 12:44
Simn added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2025
Simn added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2025
* deal with local function default arguments

* use on field functions too

* handle during JVM preprocessing

* Make analyzer thread-safe (#12083)

* remove shared lattice

* lose analyzer data dependency on com

* how bad could it be?

* make var ids atomic

* optimize because stuff fails otherwise

* cleanup

* how far can we take this?

* Revert "don't generate constructor on abstract classes"

This reverts commit d38ba0e.

* consider _ prefix when checking reserved keywords (#12090)

closes #12089

* change parallel API

* [python] Mark threads as daemon threads. (#12096)

Otherwise background threads keep the program alive, which is not consistent with other targets.

* Revert "Make some filters thread-safe (#12087)"

This reverts commit 7ea0972.

# Conflicts:
#	src/filters/filters.ml

---------

Co-authored-by: Zeta <53486764+Apprentice-Alchemist@users.noreply.github.com>
@Simn
Copy link
Member Author

Simn commented Mar 29, 2025

The benchmarks show values for HL/C now. Terrible values, but values.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments