Skip to content

🔒 Prevent JWT secret leakage in token cache#1041

Merged
is0692vs merged 2 commits into
stagingfrom
fix-jwt-secret-cache-4378765710524347307
Jun 29, 2026
Merged

🔒 Prevent JWT secret leakage in token cache#1041
is0692vs merged 2 commits into
stagingfrom
fix-jwt-secret-cache-4378765710524347307

Conversation

@is0692vs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎯 What: Removed the JWT_SECRET from the in-memory token cache key.
⚠️ Risk: If memory dumps occur or the cache is accessed maliciously, the JWT_SECRET could be exposed. This could allow attackers to forge JWT tokens and gain unauthorized access.
🛡️ Solution: Used rawToken directly as the cache key, which is unique to each user session and sufficient for caching purposes without exposing sensitive secrets.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 4378765710524347307 started by @is0692vs

Co-authored-by: is0692vs <135803462+is0692vs@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

1 Skipped Deployment
Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
open-shelf Ignored Ignored Jun 28, 2026 3:54pm

@greptile-apps

greptile-apps Bot commented Jun 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No reviewable files after applying ignore patterns.

@qodo-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Qodo reviews are paused for this user.

Troubleshooting steps vary by plan Learn more →

On a Teams plan?
Reviews resume once this user has a paid seat and their Git account is linked in Qodo.
Link Git account →

Using GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab Self-Managed, or Bitbucket Data Center?
These require an Enterprise plan - Contact us
Contact us →

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Note

Gemini is unable to generate a review for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported.

@dosubot dosubot Bot added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 28, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

このリポジトリでは staging 先行フローを採用しています。PR のターゲットを staging に変更しました。staging で動作確認後、stagingmain の PR を作成してください。

@github-actions
github-actions Bot changed the base branch from main to staging June 28, 2026 15:55
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deployment failed with the following error:

Resource is limited - try again in 24 hours (more than 100, code: "api-deployments-free-per-day").

Learn More: https://vercel.com/hirokis-projects-afd618c7?upgradeToPro=build-rate-limit

@is0692vs
is0692vs merged commit c8bdf07 into staging Jun 29, 2026
12 of 13 checks passed
@is0692vs
is0692vs deleted the fix-jwt-secret-cache-4378765710524347307 branch June 29, 2026 01:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working size/XS

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant