unfortunate mixing of inspire theme vocabulary locations in TG example #129
|
From metadata repository: In this TG example there is an unfortunate mixing of 2 available locations of the inspire themes thesaurus usage of INSPIRE registry URI's for concepts I noticed some in our domain considering the combination of these 2 locations as a formal recommendation, however combining of the 2 locations should be strongly prevented. I wonder if we could consider something in the ATS to fix this issue, or should this go back to the TG group? Why shouldn't there be a combination of the 2 thesauri locations? The 2 thesauri use different URI's for the same concepts. A machine parsing the metadata would expect to find in the metadata the same uri identifying the thesaurus, as well as in the inScheme property of the concept. Or vice versa, if, in a metadata edit tool, users are enabled to select a keyword from a thesaurus, the thesaurus identifier would typically be filled with the inscheme property of the selected concept. In case the combination of thesauri locations is actually intentional, then i would like to propose to use in both thesauri locations the same uri's. How do others perceive this challenge? |
Replies: 4 comments
|
We had some discussion on the note under requirement 1.4 Does the note imply that uri's from the inspire registry can also be used? Or does TG indicate the use of eionet uri's? Considering above, when trying to link to a theme concept in eionet, we noticed there doesn't seem to be a language-neutral uri for a concept. There are uri's in http://rdfdata.eionet.europa.eu/inspirethemes/themes.rdf (http://rdfdata.eionet.europa.eu/inspirethemes/ontology/InspireTheme#1), but these don't resolve to content. We see no other option then to include the language specific uri for a theme: http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/nl/inspire-theme/ps |
|
This issue was originally opened in the Validator helpdesk. We moved it here, since it addresses a more general INSPIRE discussion topic and is not Validator-specific. |
|
@MarcoMinghini @pvgenuchten |
|
The IR metadata says:
I assume that is the reason link http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/inspire_themes link is used in the TG (recommendation metadata/2.0/rec/datasets-and-series/use-anchors-for-gemet), and not http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/theme. |


The IR metadata says:
I assume that is the reason link http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/inspire_themes link is used in the TG (recommendation metadata/2.0/rec/datasets-and-series/use-anchors-for-gemet), and not http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/theme.