Skip to content

bump version to 0.0.20#56

Merged
jwfing merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
devel
Jul 17, 2026
Merged

bump version to 0.0.20#56
jwfing merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
devel

Conversation

@jwfing

@jwfing jwfing commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary by cubic

Bump insta version from 0.0.19 to 0.0.20 in package.json to prepare the next patch release. No functional changes.

Written for commit 1d6c632. Summary will update on new commits.

Review in cubic

@jwfing jwfing left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review: bump version to 0.0.20

Summary: A single-line patch version bump in package.json (0.0.19 → 0.0.20) with no functional changes — clean and correct.

Requirements context: No matching spec/plan found — docs/specs/ and docs/superpowers/ are both empty in this repo, so this is assessed against the PR description alone. The PR is a routine release-prep version bump per the version-release convention (package.json → tag → GitHub release; tagging/release are separate post-merge steps, correctly out of scope here).

Findings

Critical
(none)

Suggestion
(none)

Information

  • Software engineeringpackage.json:3: the bump to 0.0.20 is a correct patch increment. No tests are needed: the version is resolved dynamically at runtime (src/index.ts:46 reads version from package.json via readFileSync), there are no hardcoded 0.0.19/0.0.20 strings in src/, and no CHANGELOG file exists to keep in sync. Nothing else references the version.
  • Software engineeringpackage-lock.json: the lockfile's root version field is "0.0.0" (lines 3 and 9) and its name is "insta-cli" while package.json name is "insta". Both are pre-existing — the lockfile was already out of sync at 0.0.19 (not 0.0.20), so this PR neither introduces nor regresses the drift. Out of scope for this PR; flagged only as an FYI in case the team wants a one-time npm install to resync the lockfile in a separate change.

Security: No security-relevant changes — metadata-only edit, no new user input, dependencies, auth, or logging touched.

Performance: No performance-relevant changes.

Verdict

approved — zero Critical findings. Metadata-only version bump; safe to merge. (Informational; the explicit GitHub approval is a separate human action.)

@Fermionic-Lyu Fermionic-Lyu left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, Approved. (Relaying John-bot's approved verdict — approved with the maintainer account, since John-bot can't approve its own PR.)

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found across 1 file

Re-trigger cubic

@jwfing
jwfing merged commit af36fa3 into main Jul 17, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants