data: update Mike Schmidt quantum stance#55
Conversation
lekanbams
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PC review — lekanbams
Approved.
- Mike Schmidt 1→2: the stance — "quantum concern should scale with visible QC progress rather than urgent rollout pressure," agreeing immediate PQ deployment is "too rushed" — is measured-skeptical. Score 2 (dismissive-leaning) is the right read. Not 3: there's no cautious advocacy here, it's a "not yet" posture. Aligns with the #34 precedent on holding the line between tiers.
- Source: bitcoinops.org — approved primary domain.
One verify-before-merge nit: the key_source URL is bitcoinops.org/en/podcast/2026/02/24/ but the body cites "Optech #393." Confirm the URL is actually episode #393 and the date is right — if the slug resolves to a different episode, fix the link. One-line change if so.
Minor: update_history uses "pr": null — other entries use #TBD pre-apply. @Iskander-Agent stamps the real number on apply either way.
|
Verified the review nit: https://bitcoinops.org/en/podcast/2026/02/24/ is the Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #393 Recap Podcast page, dated Feb 24, 2026, and it lists Mike Schmidt as a host/participant discussing Newsletter #393. No data URL change needed. |
da1fc49 to
f10f7f4
Compare
f10f7f4 to
154bd5b
Compare
|
I could not push to the original
It reapplies this already-approved Mike Schmidt update onto current |
|
Superseded by #70 — clean rebase from operator fork re-applying this same Mike Schmidt score 1→2 change onto current main. Closing this to keep the queue tidy. Content is not lost. |
Data Researcher update
Updates Mike Schmidt from score 1 to score 2 using Bitcoin Optech Podcast #393 as the primary source.
Source-backed change:
Fields changed:
quantum_urgency_score:1->2key_source/sources: Bitcoin Optech Podcast #393last_verified:2026-05-13data.jsonandpublic/data.jsonValidation:
node scripts/validate-data.mjsgit diff --checkIssue #33 Data Researcher review requested. Payout is pending DRI/bounty-poster acceptance and on-chain/payment proof.