feat(signals): summarize repo tradeoffs#323
Merged
JSONbored merged 2 commits intoJun 2, 2026
Merged
Conversation
JSONbored
approved these changes
Jun 2, 2026
JSONbored
left a comment
Owner
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@bitloi - approved.
A few notes:
- The tradeoff split is useful: direct PR fit, issue-discovery fit, maintainer burden, queue pressure, and policy confidence are exactly the dimensions repo owners and miners need.
- The public summary is constrained to operational guidance instead of score/reward prediction, and the unit coverage includes forbidden public-language checks.
- The implementation stays backend-only and does not add UI evidence requirements.
No code changes requested.
Closed
12 tasks
This was referenced Jul 2, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
tradeoffSummarythat separates direct-PR fit, issue-discovery fit, maintainer burden, queue pressure, and policy confidence.Closes #247
Scope
CONTRIBUTING.mdand does not reintroduce GitHub Pages, VitePress,site/, orCNAME.Validation
git diff --checknpm run actionlintnpm run typechecknpm run test:coveragelocally; global coverage stays at or above 97% for lines, statements, functions, and branches (aim for 98%+ branch coverage locally so CI variance does not fail near the threshold)npm run test:workersnpm run build:mcpnpm run test:mcp-packnpm run ui:openapi:checknpm run ui:lintnpm run ui:typechecknpm run ui:buildnpm audit --audit-level=moderateIf any required check was skipped, explain why:
npm run test:cipassed locally. Coverage summary: statements 99.07%, branches 97.05%, functions 98.34%, lines 99.66%.Safety
Notes