Skip to content

Remove prop-types dependency#6102

Merged
Methuselah96 merged 1 commit into
JedWatson:masterfrom
atlassian-forks:atl-mk-DCA11Y-3444-remove-prop-types-dependency
Jul 16, 2026
Merged

Remove prop-types dependency#6102
Methuselah96 merged 1 commit into
JedWatson:masterfrom
atlassian-forks:atl-mk-DCA11Y-3444-remove-prop-types-dependency

Conversation

@atl-mk

@atl-mk atl-mk commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This doesn't remove it entirely from the production package. It still comes through react-transition-group.

However, I don't see any need for a direct dependency on prop-types given the TS rewrite of v5?

@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 6f12ca9

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@codesandbox-ci

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

@atl-mk

atl-mk commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Methuselah96 apologies, tagging you for visibility. You seem to be the most active maintainer

@Methuselah96

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks!

@Methuselah96
Methuselah96 merged commit 4b69480 into JedWatson:master Jul 16, 2026
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants