Skip to content

test: new NonLinMPC disturbance rejection test with MultipleShooting and nint_u options - #420

Merged
franckgaga merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
test_dist_rej_nmpc
Aug 4, 2026
Merged

test: new NonLinMPC disturbance rejection test with MultipleShooting and nint_u options#420
franckgaga merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
test_dist_rej_nmpc

Conversation

@franckgaga

@franckgaga franckgaga commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It verifies that the unmeasured disturbance model transcribed as a multiple shooting works as expected, since the stochastic defects are treated separately as linear equality constraints (precisely, to verify that the ModelPredictiveControl.disturbedinput! function does it jobs as expected).

It allows to test that the multiple shooting transcription work as expected, since the stochastic defect are treated separately as linear equality constraints.
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.40%. Comparing base (2ef27c3) to head (151b1bd).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #420   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.40%   98.40%           
=======================================
  Files          29       29           
  Lines        6132     6132           
=======================================
  Hits         6034     6034           
  Misses         98       98           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@franckgaga
franckgaga merged commit 6fb787d into main Aug 4, 2026
5 checks passed
@franckgaga
franckgaga deleted the test_dist_rej_nmpc branch August 4, 2026 22:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants