Skip to content

Resolve Hermes ↔ OpenClaw directionality and pushback rules #33

Description

@marcusglee11

Source

Architecture Normalization Issue 4 — derived from docs/10_meta/Architecture_Normalization_Targeted_Issue_List_2026-04-24.md

Scope

Define whether peer COOs may direct one another, what is authoritative vs advisory, and how pushback/escalation works.

Source docs

  • docs/10_meta/Architecture_Normalization_Reconciliation_Packet_2026-04-24.md
  • docs/10_meta/COO_Authority_Contract_Draft_2026-04-24.md
  • Relevant runtime CLI / COO command surfaces

Acceptance criteria

  • Peer directionality class explicit
  • Active/standby interaction clear
  • Pushback and escalation rules explicit

Required repo surfaces before merge

  • Canonical governance/architecture docs
  • docs/10_meta/ARCHITECTURE_SOURCE_OF_TRUTH.md
  • Architecture changelog
  • ADR if ratified

Authority rules

  • Hermes and OpenClaw peer direction is advisory unless re-issued through active COO or CEO authority path

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions