research: r=1 bounded-summary non-compression witness for the cut network - #550
Draft
LightChainr wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
research: r=1 bounded-summary non-compression witness for the cut network#550LightChainr wants to merge 2 commits into
LightChainr wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
…work Exact 7-vertex planar two-terminal pair with identical (S(z), n, H2, b2, r=1 neighbourhood) and a frozen E2_c2 split 937/1050 vs 313/350. Census closes the declared families through SP n=12 and the full HID hop grid. Cut-dependence verdict CUTS_LAW_EQUIVALENT_NOT_ISOMORPHIC; embedding verdict TWO_PORT_EMBEDDING_SUFFICES. No Monte Carlo, no main/STATUS write.
Prove that every plane two-terminal vertex-network with cofacial terminals is a rank-one embedded-torus cut-network gadget. The n=7 pair only needs the hypotheses; no named square-HNF occupation is constructed. Manuscript verdict BOUNDED_SUMMARY_INSUFFICIENT; frozen search-protocol token unchanged. Size claim restricted to declared families. verify_witness is a hard-coded verifier, not a second implementation. Cut-network minimality UNRESOLVED. No new search, no Monte Carlo, no main/STATUS write.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
Advance the cut-network / predictive-state paper by one exact, independently verified lemma: a predeclared bounded summary that includes the complete safe-subset polynomial and the radius-1 terminal neighbourhood is not sufficient for a frozen depth-2 compositional language.
This is the minimality-up-to-summary test named as next PRIMARY in PR #549. It does not reopen the research DAG, add Monte Carlo, or enlarge the descriptor ladder.
Dependency PRs (read-only, not stacked): #491 cut-network theorem, #549 parallel-gadget lower bound, #435 survival-law no-go. This branch is additive from current
main.Verdict
Manuscript token:
BOUNDED_SUMMARY_INSUFFICIENTFrozen search-protocol token (locked before search, not rewritten):
NO_COMPRESSION_WITNESS_FOUND. Same mathematical outcome.Primary pair: n=7 planar two-terminal vertex-networks, identical
first split on frozen experiment E2_c2:
Delayed-fork E1_c1 equals 1 on both graphs, so this is independent of the PR #549 successor-second-moment mechanism. Radius-2 neighbourhoods of this pair differ, so the lemma is r=1 only. The n=7 pair is the smallest witness found in the declared enumerated families, not a claimed global minimum among all plane two-terminal vertex-networks.
Census (contract limits)
Declared families were exhausted to the frozen n≤12 bounds:
HID r=2 is closed on all nine hop combinations. SP n=11 and n=12 unique generation is included (59324 + 212771 graphs).
Analysis notes completed with this PR
CUTS_LAW_EQUIVALENT_NOT_ISOMORPHIC. Alternate admissible occupied cuts preserve pair/triple event sets and the future connecting-subset family; they need not be isomorphic as rooted networks. Finite examples: N16 cut reversal; two occupied-cycle searches on each saved N425 checkpoint. The network is a proof device in a fixed-cut gauge, not a physical angular mark.GENERAL_REALIZATION_LEMMA. A new general lemma (notes/p1-plane-tt-realization-lemma-20260902.md) constructs, for every finite plane two-terminal vertex-network with cofacial terminals and no terminal edge, a finite honestly embedded torus host and a rank-one occupied essential cycle whose residual cut-network recovers the network. The n=7 pair only needs the hypotheses. Parallel-gadget §6 is not a surjectivity proof (it embeds k copies of two already-realised N16 gadgets). The cut-network theorem is the opposite direction. No named square-HNF occupation of the n=7 pair is constructed.notes/p1-theorem-scope-skeleton.mdfilled without Issue/PR numbers as hypotheses. Cut-network minimality remainsUNRESOLVED.notes/p429-r1-claim-wording-erratum-20260902.md.Files
research/summary_search/— exactfractions.Fractionlibrary, search-independent hard-coded witness verifier (same stdlib primitives; not a fully independent implementation), census generatorstests/test_p429_r1_noncompression_witness.pyresults/p429-r1-bounded-summary/— machine JSON, markdown census, metadatanotes/p429-r1-noncompression-certificate-20260902.mdnotes/p429-r1-search-contract-20260902.md— frozen contract (protocol tokens locked; provenance header only)notes/p429-r1-claim-boundary-20260902.mdnotes/p429-r1-claim-wording-erratum-20260902.mdnotes/p1-cut-dependence-20260902.mdnotes/p1-plane-tt-realization-lemma-20260902.md— new general realization lemma + proofnotes/p1-n7-torus-embedding-20260902.md— hypothesis check for the n=7 pairnotes/p1-theorem-scope-skeleton.mdNo
docs/STATUS.md,ROADMAP, claim-ledger, production source, or Issue lifecycle change.Claim boundary
Proves failure of
(S(z), n, H2, b2, r=1 neighbourhood)on the declared finite class. Does not prove: r=2 failure; Euclidean dimension lower bound; scalar-encoding impossibility; continuum/CFT statements; minimality of the full cut network (UNRESOLVED); the same split for every HNF square-site torus; global n-minimality among all plane two-terminal networks.Proposed claim level: C5 for the finite two-terminal statement and for the realization lemma; C1 for the search-independent hard-coded witness verifier (not a fully independent implementation).
Checks
Expected:
self-checks passed,VERIFY_OK, S(1, 7, 21, 35, 33, 15, 2, 0), E2_c2937/1050vs313/350, gap1/525. All four unit tests pass.Stop rule
No larger parallel products, no new descriptors, no further SP census as a default. Next useful step after this PR is manuscript mode for P1, not another search class.
No main write, auto-merge, Issue lifecycle change, or production authorization.