Follow-up from PR #50 — auto-proposed from the code review.
Finding: [NOTE] The review-agent phrasing rule only requires WARNING and NOTE findings to be self-contained sentences, but Step 9 in submit-for-review also promotes CRITICAL findings to follow-up issue titles when ai is advisory; consider extending the phrasing rule to CRITICAL so advisory-mode follow-ups inherit the same standalone-title guarantee.
See the review comment on the PR for context.
Follow-up from PR #50 — auto-proposed from the code review.
Finding: [NOTE] The review-agent phrasing rule only requires WARNING and NOTE findings to be self-contained sentences, but Step 9 in submit-for-review also promotes CRITICAL findings to follow-up issue titles when
aiisadvisory; consider extending the phrasing rule to CRITICAL so advisory-mode follow-ups inherit the same standalone-title guarantee.See the review comment on the PR for context.