Skip to content

Conversation

@jubrad
Copy link
Contributor

@jubrad jubrad commented Mar 27, 2025

Motivation

The syntax was wrong, this pr corrects it.

Tips for reviewer

Checklist

  • This PR has adequate test coverage / QA involvement has been duly considered. (trigger-ci for additional test/nightly runs)
  • This PR has an associated up-to-date design doc, is a design doc (template), or is sufficiently small to not require a design.
  • If this PR evolves an existing $T ⇔ Proto$T mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with a T-proto label.
  • If this PR will require changes to cloud orchestration or tests, there is a companion cloud PR to account for those changes that is tagged with the release-blocker label (example).
  • If this PR includes major user-facing behavior changes, I have pinged the relevant PM to schedule a changelog post.

@jubrad jubrad requested a review from kay-kim March 27, 2025 00:32
@jubrad jubrad requested a review from a team as a code owner March 27, 2025 00:32
@kay-kim kay-kim merged commit 28b3502 into MaterializeInc:main Mar 27, 2025
11 checks passed
kay-kim pushed a commit to kay-kim/materialize that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2025
kay-kim added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2025
Co-authored-by: Justin Bradfield <justin@materialize.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants