Skip to content

merge queue: embarking main (7fa0f66) and #987 together#990

Closed
mergify[bot] wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
mergify/merge-queue/b138a94ba4
Closed

merge queue: embarking main (7fa0f66) and #987 together#990
mergify[bot] wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
mergify/merge-queue/b138a94ba4

Conversation

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Feb 25, 2026

✨ Pull request #987 which was ahead in the queue has been dequeued (for the following reason: pull request manually updated). ✨

Branch main (7fa0f66) and #987 are embarked together for merge.

This pull request has been created by Mergify to speculatively check the mergeability of #987.
You don't need to do anything. Mergify will close this pull request automatically when it is complete.

Required conditions of queue default for merge:

Required conditions to stay in the queue:

---
checking_base_sha: 7fa0f669573a0e5350535311f515c8bc74432f04
previous_failed_batches: []
pull_requests:
  - number: 987
...

jd and others added 2 commits February 25, 2026 09:04
Replace untyped dict manipulation of GitHub webhook payloads with
Pydantic models, parsing once at the boundary in get_github_event()
and passing typed objects throughout. This removes ~40 lines of manual
isinstance/get checks and catches schema violations early.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Change-Id: I06f75cbee3238d0418560159c2888c70560a1e46
Claude-Session-Id: fbc3e1a8-2cec-43d2-8105-298313058e7a
@mergify mergify bot requested a deployment to Mergify Merge Protections February 25, 2026 10:21 In progress
@mergify mergify bot closed this Feb 25, 2026
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/merge-queue/b138a94ba4 branch February 25, 2026 10:21
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Feb 25, 2026

🧪 CI Insights

Here's what we observed from your CI run for 8ac946f.

🟢 All jobs passed!

But CI Insights is watching 👀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant