What's New
README rewritten with product narrative
- Problem → proof → action structure (Jobs launch + Belfort Straight Line method)
- Leads with the results users care about: 0 blockers, +11% routing accuracy, 4.61 goal fidelity
- Full ranking data in a collapsible block — nothing hidden, just prioritized
- Per-trait delta table (FP vs No FP) for transparency
- FAQ rewritten as objection handling
Principle vs hard-rule distinction in Four Iron Rules (四条铁律)
- Items 1–3 now labeled (原则) — default stance, not absolute prohibition
- Item 4 remains (硬规则) — no exceptions
- Philosophy: "默认立场,不是绝对禁令" — pragmatic deviation with stated reason is allowed
Team preset redesigned
- All discipline modules active by default with
## MODULE:headers - Each section has
> Remove this section if...guidance - No more commented-out blocks requiring manual uncommenting
Strategy tiers simplified
- Removed three-tier framing from README
- New guidance: "Default gives you everything. Remove what you don't need."
fp/presets/core.mdavailable for minimal setups
Reproducible benchmarks
benchmarks/run-eval.sh/run-eval.cmd— one-click full evalbenchmarks/README.md— complete reproduction documentation- Version snapshots for exact comparison
Benchmark Results (this session)
| Version | Score | Blockers |
|---|---|---|
| v-final (0.5.4) | 4.12 | 0 |
| v0 (no FP) | 4.10 | 3 |
| v-pre053 (absolute language) | 4.08 | 2 |
| v-core (rules only) | 4.05 | 2 |
Principles beat absolute commands (4.12 vs 4.08). Full discipline beats core-only (4.12 vs 4.05).
Full Changelog: v0.5.3...v0.5.4