Skip to content

Typo in WMI namespace reference in upgrade-on-premises-infrastructure.#2120

Merged
ktoliver merged 1 commit intoMicrosoftDocs:masterfrom
StoffePro:master
Oct 25, 2021
Merged

Typo in WMI namespace reference in upgrade-on-premises-infrastructure.#2120
ktoliver merged 1 commit intoMicrosoftDocs:masterfrom
StoffePro:master

Conversation

@StoffePro
Copy link
Copy Markdown

The documentation for OS upgrade of on-prem site server points users to fix permissions on CCM\site_. Should read SMS\site_sitecode.

@PRMerger15
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@StoffePro : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@ktoliver
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"

@PRMerger6 PRMerger6 added the aq-pr-triaged Tracking label for the PR review team label Oct 21, 2021
@aczechowski
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @StoffePro for the feedback...that seems to be a contested point recently. That was recently switched to "CCM" based on MicrosoftDocs/memdocs#1568. So let me check into why it might show differently.

@StoffePro
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Interresting. I have four separate SCCM sites available to me at the moment the newest of which is on version 2107, and none of them have a site_ under CCM, while everyone has it under SMS.

root\sms\site_ is also what we've given as the wmi namespace to the powershell cmdlets for as long as I've been working with sccm.

There is also this: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/mem/configmgr/develop/core/understand/sqlviews/wmi-namespaces-classes-configuration-manager-reports

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@aczechowski aczechowski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I should have checked the first time this came up, from engineering:

I’ve only ever seen it be SMS, if it’s CCM at times it must be for some pretty old sites. I think SMS is correct.

Thanks @StoffePro for making this contribution to fix it back! 😄

@aczechowski
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

aczechowski commented Oct 25, 2021

#label:"ready-to-merge"

@ktoliver ktoliver merged commit b76d851 into MicrosoftDocs:master Oct 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants