[WIP: Edit/Decide] Adding in much more extensive set of potential future benchmarks#11
Closed
davidlmobley wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
[WIP: Edit/Decide] Adding in much more extensive set of potential future benchmarks#11davidlmobley wants to merge 1 commit into
davidlmobley wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
davidlmobley
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2016
Member
Author
|
Closing this as Gilson and I are going to work on incorporating this material via a separate PR I'll open shortly. |
Merged
3 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This would add back in text providing a much more extensive set of potential future benchmarks, along with detailed discussion of the challenges, which had to be cut for space reasons. It still needs editing, especially by Gilson, and additional polishing. Also, if it is going to be added, then the "The future of..." section would need to have some of its content removed since this provides a more extensive version of the same thing.