Skip to content

Basic modifications to make it compatible with KSP 1.3. No localization#888

Closed
alcidesv wants to merge 1 commit into
MuMech:masterfrom
alcidesv:feature/mechjeb-stable-and-ksp-1.3
Closed

Basic modifications to make it compatible with KSP 1.3. No localization#888
alcidesv wants to merge 1 commit into
MuMech:masterfrom
alcidesv:feature/mechjeb-stable-and-ksp-1.3

Conversation

@alcidesv
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@sarbian sarbian changed the base branch from master to dev May 26, 2017 16:31
@sarbian sarbian changed the base branch from dev to master May 26, 2017 16:32
@sarbian
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sarbian commented May 26, 2017

Can you redo the PR on the dev branch (just changing the PR branch in github seems to be a bad idea) ? Or I can use the changes I have in my local branch.

@sarbian sarbian closed this May 26, 2017
@sarbian
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sarbian commented May 26, 2017

Also, without the Tuple changes please. I want to keep using my local version of smooth since I can't update the KSP one.
Thanks :)

@alcidesv
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I'm not familiar with the project and the state of the 'dev' branch. Maybe you can take it from here?

@sarbian
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sarbian commented May 26, 2017

Sure. Thanks for the work 👍

lamont-granquist added a commit that referenced this pull request May 28, 2026
Don't try to set the SMA based on desired altitude, but just
circularize at whatever the apoapsis actually is.

We could try to circularize at the precise altitude if the desired altitude <
apo, but that could get more costly so I'm going to skip thinking about
it (some people will want it, some people probably won't, heuristics
will add more edge conditions and buttons and I don't think it is worth
it).

closes #1971
closes #888 (maybe)
lamont-granquist added a commit that referenced this pull request May 28, 2026
Don't try to set the SMA based on desired altitude, but just
circularize at whatever the apoapsis actually is.

We could try to circularize at the precise altitude if the desired altitude <
apo, but that could get more costly so I'm going to skip thinking about
it (some people will want it, some people probably won't, heuristics
will add more edge conditions and buttons and I don't think it is worth
it).

closes #1971
closes #888 (maybe)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants