Skip to content

Update the process type of the 3D CMS 13 TeV#2436

Merged
achiefa merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
prcs_type_cms_3d
Mar 2, 2026
Merged

Update the process type of the 3D CMS 13 TeV#2436
achiefa merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
prcs_type_cms_3d

Conversation

@achiefa
Copy link
Contributor

@achiefa achiefa commented Mar 2, 2026

Just a small change in the process options. This is needed for the power correction analysis since I need to tell apart DIJET and DIJET_3D.

@achiefa achiefa requested review from enocera and scarlehoff March 2, 2026 11:49
@achiefa achiefa self-assigned this Mar 2, 2026
@achiefa
Copy link
Contributor Author

achiefa commented Mar 2, 2026

@scarlehoff before merging this I just want to check whether this has some side effects in validphys. I can't see any but I wnat to double check.

@scarlehoff
Copy link
Member

You created the option but have not change the data, right?

The side effect (rather, a direct effect) is that by doing this you uncorrelate the scale variations of this process with the rest of the dijet data.

@achiefa
Copy link
Contributor Author

achiefa commented Mar 2, 2026

The option was created in #2361. The process_type in the metadata was already DIJET_3D.

@scarlehoff
Copy link
Member

Ah, so the only thing that has changed is the name that before was dijet for both?

@achiefa
Copy link
Contributor Author

achiefa commented Mar 2, 2026

Yes, exactly.

@scarlehoff
Copy link
Member

there should be no side effects (famous last words)

@achiefa achiefa merged commit f38f910 into master Mar 2, 2026
12 checks passed
@achiefa achiefa deleted the prcs_type_cms_3d branch March 2, 2026 15:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants