✅️ Use new server side validation method#12
Merged
Conversation
Jun Aishima (JunAishima)
approved these changes
May 28, 2026
Contributor
Jun Aishima (JunAishima)
left a comment
Jun Aishima (JunAishima)
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good!
Contributor
Author
|
Resolved in |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Raw data written at QAS can have ambiguous structure, requiring validation.
Rather than have this code be in the function or at the workstation, it's more efficient to perform this server side prior to returning the data to the client. Eugene (@genematx) added a new convenience function for use to use in this circumstance.